Judicial proceedings suspended due to lawyers’ strike

Published March 21, 2019
A man walks past a locked city courts room during a lawyers' strike.—AFP/File
A man walks past a locked city courts room during a lawyers' strike.—AFP/File

KARACHI: Legal proceedings remained suspended at the subordinate judiciary on Wednesday due to a lawyers’ boycott on the call of the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) against a decision of the National Judicial Policy Making Committee (NJPMC).

Hundreds of cases fixed at the City Courts and district courts in Malir could not be taken up for hearing due to non-production of undertrial prisoners from prisons because of the lawyers’ boycott.

Courtrooms wore a deserted look and litigants suffered a lot as most lawyers stayed away from the courts.

The PBC had called for a two-day strike (Wednesday and Thursday) across the country against the March 11 decision of NJPMC to open a complaint cell at respective SP office in every district to empower police to decide applications seeking registration of FIRs instead of approaching the courts first.

Earlier, justices of peace/sessions judges had directly been entertaining citizens’ applications filed under Sections 22-A and 22-B of the Criminal Procedure Code after an SHO refused to lodge FIRs.

Partial strike at SHC

At the Sindh High Court, legal work also remained disturbed as representatives of the Sindh High Court Bar Association stopped lawyers, litigants and provincial and federal law officers at the main entrances of the SHC building and asked them to stay away from courts.

SHCBA president Mohammad Aqil said that the bar representatives were present at all the three entrances of the SHC since morning in order to enforce the strike call given by the apex body of the country’s lawyers.

He claimed that the strike was successful and they would repeat it on Thursday (today).

Meanwhile, jail authorities brought UTPs before special courts in the city, including antiterrorism courts, but the legal work was partly disturbed there since the attendance of lawyers remained thin.

Published in Dawn, March 21st, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

What now?
20 Sep, 2024

What now?

Govt's actions could turn the reserved seats verdict into a major clash between institutions. It is a risky and unfortunate escalation.
IHK election farce
20 Sep, 2024

IHK election farce

WHILE India will be keen to trumpet the holding of elections in held Kashmir as a return to ‘normalcy’, things...
Donating organs
20 Sep, 2024

Donating organs

CERTAIN philanthropic practices require a more scientific temperament than ours to flourish. Deceased organ donation...
Lingering concerns
19 Sep, 2024

Lingering concerns

Embarrassed after failing to muster numbers during the high-stakes drama that played out all weekend, the govt will need time to regroup.
Pager explosions
Updated 19 Sep, 2024

Pager explosions

This dangerous brinkmanship is likely to drag the region — and the global economy — into a vortex of violence and instability.
Losing to China
19 Sep, 2024

Losing to China

AT a time when they should have stepped up, a sense of complacency seemed to have descended on the Pakistan hockey...