US court declines to recognise Jerusalem as part of Israel

Published June 9, 2015
The decision renders a US law, made more than 10 years ago, unconstitutional. —AP/File
The decision renders a US law, made more than 10 years ago, unconstitutional. —AP/File

WASHINGTON: The US Supreme Court declined on Monday to show Jerusalem as a part of Israel in American passports despite a strong congressional endorsement of the demand.

The decision renders a US law, made more than 10 years ago, unconstitutional.

The court ruled on a plea from a US citizen born in Jerusalem whose parents wanted his US passport to show his birthplace as Israel, instead of Jerusalem. The parents of Menachem Binyamin Zivotofsky began their legal battle in 2002, soon after his birth. The requested change would have affected the US policy towards Jerusalem, which still recognises the disputed nature of the historical city.

Both Palestinians and Israelis have equal claim to Jerusalem and the current US policy accommodates both. The US Congress, however, endorsed the demand for change more than a decade ago.

The ruling came just a few months after a feud between US President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who tried to prevent the US administration from concluding a nuclear deal with Iran.

As the court heard the plea, the US State Department’s warned that a simple passport alteration could “provoke uproar throughout the Arab and Muslim world.”

US Solicitor General Donald Verrilli argued that a ruling for the Zivotofskys would undermine the president’s authority to set policy for “the most vexing and volatile and difficult diplomatic issue that this country has faced for decades.”

The decision came more than seven months after both sides completed oral arguments in early November. It was the longest-pending high court decision.

The requested change would have allowed more than 50,000 US citizens, born in Jerusalem, to show Israel as their birthplace.

Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the 6-3 decision for the court, declaring: “The power to recognise or decline to recognize a foreign state and its territorial bounds resides in the president alone.”

Published in Dawn, June 9th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Hasty transition
Updated 05 May, 2024

Hasty transition

Ostensibly, the aim is to exert greater control over social media and to gain more power to crack down on activists, dissidents and journalists.
One small step…
05 May, 2024

One small step…

THERE is some good news for the nation from the heavens above. On Friday, Pakistan managed to dispatch a lunar...
Not out of the woods
05 May, 2024

Not out of the woods

PAKISTAN’S economic vitals might be showing some signs of improvement, but the country is not yet out of danger....
Rigging claims
Updated 04 May, 2024

Rigging claims

The PTI’s allegations are not new; most elections in Pakistan have been controversial, and it is almost a given that results will be challenged by the losing side.
Gaza’s wasteland
04 May, 2024

Gaza’s wasteland

SINCE the start of hostilities on Oct 7, Israel has put in ceaseless efforts to depopulate Gaza, and make the Strip...
Housing scams
04 May, 2024

Housing scams

THE story of illegal housing schemes in Punjab is the story of greed, corruption and plunder. Major players in these...