COLOMBO: The much awaited talks between Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena and former President Mahinda Rajapaksa to sort out problems between them ended inconclusively on Wednesday.

“Today’s meeting was only a preliminary one. They will have to meet several times to sort things out. There are many knotty issues to be tackled,” a source close to Sirisena said.

The source insisted that the two leaders discussed only matters relating to their party, the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP). While Sirisena is chairman of the party by virtue of being the President of Sri Lanka, Rajapaksa in a patron of the party by virtue of having been a past president of Lanka.

But the two are at daggers drawn because they contested the last presidential election in January as rival candidates. The SLFP, which is now divided into two factions, wants to fight the coming parliamentary elections as one party in order to beat the rival United National Party (UNP). But Sirisena and Rajapaksa are not able to see eye to eye on any issue.

On Tuesday, Sirisena’s office issued a statement which said that he would, under no circumstances, betray the over 6 million Lankans who voted for him in his talks with Rajapaksa.

On the same day, Rajapaksa also issued a statement saying that the Sirisena government is arresting his supporters out of sheer political vendetta. An army corporal, who was in his son Namal’s security group, was arrested on suspicion of planning to shoot Sirisena at a political meeting. These actions did not augur well for his talks with Sirisena, Rajapaksa said.

Meanwhile, Dilan Perera, a Rajapaksa loyalist, said the Rajapaksa-Sirisena talks are primarily meant to oust Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and his United National Party (UNP) from the government. This put Sirisena in a spot because he won the presidential election on the basis of the organisational strength of the UNP.

Mahinda Rajapaksa
Mahinda Rajapaksa

Opposing Dilan Perera, Democratic Peoples’ Front (DPF) leader, Mano Ganeshan, said the minority Tamils and Muslims would not allow Rajapaksa to come back to power as they had suffered immensely during his rule from 2005 to 2014.

Published in Dawn, May 7th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Hasty transition
Updated 05 May, 2024

Hasty transition

Ostensibly, the aim is to exert greater control over social media and to gain more power to crack down on activists, dissidents and journalists.
One small step…
05 May, 2024

One small step…

THERE is some good news for the nation from the heavens above. On Friday, Pakistan managed to dispatch a lunar...
Not out of the woods
05 May, 2024

Not out of the woods

PAKISTAN’S economic vitals might be showing some signs of improvement, but the country is not yet out of danger....
Rigging claims
Updated 04 May, 2024

Rigging claims

The PTI’s allegations are not new; most elections in Pakistan have been controversial, and it is almost a given that results will be challenged by the losing side.
Gaza’s wasteland
04 May, 2024

Gaza’s wasteland

SINCE the start of hostilities on Oct 7, Israel has put in ceaseless efforts to depopulate Gaza, and make the Strip...
Housing scams
04 May, 2024

Housing scams

THE story of illegal housing schemes in Punjab is the story of greed, corruption and plunder. Major players in these...