ISLAMABAD: While hearing a petition filed by a district and sessions judge against his repatriation to Punjab, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) will examine the appointment of two other judges who were absorbed in the Islamabad judiciary along with the petitioner.

Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) judge Atiqur Rehman, additional district and sessions judge (ADSJ) Kamran Basharat Mufti and District and Sessions Judge (DSJ) Syed Muzaffar Ali Shah had joined the Islamabad Judicial Service on deputation in 2011 in BS-22.

The IHC authorities sent (DSJ) Syed Muzaffar Ali Shah back to the Punjab Judicial Service on April 9, 2013.

In its notification, the IHC administration said the DSJ Syed Muzaffar Ali Shah’s services were no longer required and he was being repatriated to his parent department as additional district and sessions judge in BS-20.

Shah through his counsel Syed Javed Akbar challenged the order of the IHC on Tuesday of sending him back to his parent department that too in lower grade.

His counsel adopted before the IHC Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui that on March 17, 2011, IHC administration committee decided to absorb the Atiqur Rehman from Bloachistan, Kamran Basharat Mufti from Punjab and the petitioner Shah.

Upon having option from the Petitioner, IHC made a request to the Lahore High Court (LHC) on March 21, 2011 for issuance of a no objection certificate for purpose of absorption of the petitioner in the subordinate judiciary of Islamabad.

After completing all the requirements, Shah, Mufti and Rehman were absorbed in the Islamabad judiciary on March 28, 2011.

In April last year the petitioner was sent back to the parent department on the pretext that he was not absorbed in accordance with the rules.

The petitioner subsequently relinquished the charge on April 11 and after a considerably long period of 3 months and 6 days, LHC administration allowed him to join Punjab Judicial Service as ADSJ.

The counsel alleged that the judge was not given due process of hearing at a proper forum for redressal of his grievances and was condemned unheard.

He requested the court to set aside the order for his repatriation enabling the petitioner to resume his work in Islamabad judiciary as DSJ.

The court however asked him to name Judge Rehman and ADSJ Mufti as parties in the petition and adjourned the matter.

Opinion

Editorial

Rigging claims
Updated 04 May, 2024

Rigging claims

The PTI’s allegations are not new; most elections in Pakistan have been controversial, and it is almost a given that results will be challenged by the losing side.
Gaza’s wasteland
04 May, 2024

Gaza’s wasteland

SINCE the start of hostilities on Oct 7, Israel has put in ceaseless efforts to depopulate Gaza, and make the Strip...
Housing scams
04 May, 2024

Housing scams

THE story of illegal housing schemes in Punjab is the story of greed, corruption and plunder. Major players in these...
Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...