NEW YORK, Nov 5: Israel’s hawkish Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had ordered security forces to prepare for an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities in 2010, but his military chief and head of the intelligence agency refused to follow orders, calling the move “illegal” and akin to “stealing a war”.

Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak was part of the plan.

Citing an investigative report by an Israeli channel, The New York Times said on Monday that the military chief and the top spy of Israel vehemently opposed the move that could have brought the two countries on the verge of war.

At the end of a meeting of the forum of seven senior government ministers in 2010, which the then Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi and former Mossad chief Meir Dagan attended, Netanyahu gave an order to raise the level of preparation of Israel's security apparatus to prepare for a military strike.

The Times said the report, by the respected investigative journalist Ilana Dayan, came in the form of a promotional preview for an hour-long documentary about Israel’s decision-making process regarding Iran. Ms Dayan said Netanyahu, in a meeting with a small circle of top ministers, turned to Gabi Ashkenazi and told him to “set the systems for P-plus,” a term meaning that an operation would start soon.

The investigation by the Channel 2 programme Uvda (Fact), Dagan came out sharply against the attack on Iran telling Netanyahu and Defence Minister Ehud Barak, “You are likely to make an illegal decision to go to war. Only the cabinet is authorised to decide this.”

Meanwhile, associates of Ashkenazi reportedly said the former Israel Defence Forces (IDF) chief was concerned that raising the alert level would “create new facts on the ground”, leading to a war.

Barak in an interview to the channel said that Ashkenazi responded to Netanyahu at the time saying that the IDF was not ready and that he did not have the operational capacity to carry out the order.

The Defence Minister claims in the interview that in contrast to Ashkenazi and Dagan's positions, raising the alert level to “P Plus” does not necessarily entail going to war.

“The things that you are describing are the responsibility of the government. The idea that if the (IDF) chief of staff does not recommend something that is possible to do, then we cannot decide to carry it out as this has no basis in fact,” he said.

Opinion

Editorial

‘Missing’ LGs
29 Jun, 2026

‘Missing’ LGs

Across the world, successful civic governance is made possible through effective, responsive local bodies, which are closest to the voter.
Audit or ritual?
29 Jun, 2026

Audit or ritual?

THE AGP’s latest audit report of federal civil accounts is a detailed record of governance failures and...
Al Aqsa under threat
29 Jun, 2026

Al Aqsa under threat

NOT satisfied with the genocidal violence it has unleashed in Gaza, the current Israeli administration is doing all...
Truce tested
Updated 28 Jun, 2026

Truce tested

The latest US-Iran exchange should therefore be treated not as proof that dialogue has failed, but as a warning of how easily it could.
Paper promises
28 Jun, 2026

Paper promises

WHAT is a UNSC resolution worth if it is never implemented? Pakistan and China felt compelled to convene an informal...
Still the masters
28 Jun, 2026

Still the masters

CRISTIANO Ronaldo and Lionel Messi do not seem to be going away quietly. At least, not yet. The duo might have left...