IF the last few days are anything to go by, the US-Pakistan relationship is in fact as fraught as we’ve all been fearing it might be. Defence Secretary Leon Panetta implied an apology for Salala is not forthcoming; the American commander in Afghanistan said yet another attack there bore signs of the Haqqani network; and a report based on information from unnamed American officials claimed the US has been considering raids into Pakistani territory to combat militants on this side of the border. Meanwhile, a State Department report has accused Pakistan of making life difficult for American diplomats stationed here. All in all, the last few days have indicated that the mood in Washington is now one of exasperation and growing impatience.

Whatever the reasons behind it, it is unfortunate that that mood was expressed by several parts of the American government and military, both through public statements and what could have been deliberate releases of information to the US media, during a week of political crisis in Islamabad. Especially the reports about possible ground operations into Pakistan — which would be hugely damaging, given Pakistan’s position that its sovereignty not be violated — have raised suspicions of ‘leaks’ from Washington. Problematic even at the best of times, these were doubly disturbing this week, given all the other upheavals at home.

In particular, the Haqqani network issue has come to the forefront again. After each terrorist incident in Afghanistan that follows a certain pattern the US can accuse the Haqqani network and Pakistan can continue to deny that its soil was used. But the issue is no longer whether or not any given attack was launched from Pakistan. The larger picture is that this militant outfit is one of the issues that is preventing the normalisation of the relationship, and that unless it is addressed, American suspicions about Pakistani intentions will not go away. Pakistan has also officially said it will not tolerate its soil being used to launch attacks against any other country. It is time, then, to finally tackle safe havens in North Waziristan. Whether resource constraints or fear of blowback inside Pakistan, the challenges in the way of doing that now need to be addressed — with American advice and assistance. In fact, working jointly on the issue could become one way to repair ties. This is, of course, a two-way street; Friday’s attack on a check post in Upper Dir in which two Pakistani soldiers were killed is believed to have originated from across the border. Now is the time to work out a close working relationship on cross-border militancy, a project that could help rebuild the relationship in general.

Opinion

Editorial

A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...
GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...