KARACHI, June 11: Provincial lawmakers cannot scrutinise a huge spending of Rs63 billion in the head of charged expenditure during the coming financial year and will have to accept it without even asking a question, it emerged on Monday.

The amount of Rs63 billion is over Rs11 billion higher than the last year’s allocation of Rs52 billion, which had been designated as charged expenditure.

Expenditures charged on the provincial consolidated fund, or simply charged expenditures, are not put to a vote under Article 121 of the Constitution.

Budget documents show that while allocations for almost all the heads designated under the charged expenditure has increased, only a single amount — allocation for judges of the high court — has come down by around Rs70 million. They did not even utilise last year’s full allocation.

The charged expenditure allocation for food has been increased by over 150 per cent in a year, although the actual spending last year was triple than the original allocation.

The charged expenditure includes the remuneration payable to the provincial governor and other expenditure relating to his office and the remuneration payable to the judges of the high court, the speaker and the deputy speaker of the assembly, the administrative expenses, including the remuneration payable to officers and servants of court and secretariat of the provincial assembly.

The charged expenditure also includes all debt charges for which provincial government is liable to pay, including interests, sinking fund, the repayment of amortizations of capital and other security of provincial consolidated fund and any sums required to satisfy any judgement, decree or award against the province by any court or any tribunal and any other sum declared by the Constitution or by an Act of the assembly to be so charged.

The break-up of the charged expenditure (CE) as mentioned in the budget documents for the year 2012-13 is: estimated charged expenditure by executive and legislative organs (which include provincial assembly, provincial executive, governor, his military secretary and other staff, ombudsman, etc,) is Rs904 million as against last year’s Rs758 million (an increase of Rs146 million), though it ended up spending over Rs997 million.

A total estimated allocation for the CE of financial and fiscal affairs is Rs9.67 billion as against the last year’s Rs9.27 billion, though it ended up spending over Rs9.8 billion.

The total estimated CE allocation on courts/justice is over Rs1.6 billion as against the last year’s Rs1.67 billion, though only Rs1.57 billion was spent.

The total CE current revenue expenditure has been estimated to be Rs12.2 billion as against the last year’s Rs11.77 billion, though over Rs12.4 billion was spent in the outgoing fiscal year.

A total CE allocation on food is expected to be Rs5 billion as against the last year’s Rs2 billion, though the government ended up spending over Rs6.1 billion.

The total CE estimated repayment of principal-domestic debt is to be over Rs34 billion as against the last year’s Rs31 billion.

Opinion

Editorial

Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...
Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...