International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Yukiya Amano (L) speaks during a press conference as Iran's chief nuclear negotiator Said Jalili (R) looks on in Tehran on May 21, 2012 during the former's official visit that was being closely watched ahead of wider nuclear talks between Iran and world powers later this week. AFP PHOTO/FARS NEWS/HAMED JAFARNEJAD
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Yukiya Amano (L) speaks during a press conference as Iran's chief nuclear negotiator Said Jalili (R) looks on in Tehran on May 21, 2012 during the former's official visit that was being closely watched ahead of wider nuclear talks between Iran and world powers later this week.     — Photo by  AFP

BAGHDAD: Iran and six world powers meet for talks in Baghdad on Wednesday hoping to silence what US President Barack Obama called the “drums of war” and pave the way to a deal that will end decades of enmity.

The one overriding issue is Iran’s nuclear programme, which the Islamic republic insists is peaceful but which much of the international community suspects masks an attempt to join the elite club of nations with the bomb.

The fear is that a nuclear-armed Iran would destabilise the already volatile Middle East and sound the death knell for 60 years of international efforts to prevent the spread of atomic weapons, sparking a regional arms race.

Israel, Washington's closest ally in the region, feels its very existence would be under threat and has refused to rule out a pre-emptive strike on Iran's nuclear facilities.

Obama took office in January 2009 offering a radical change in approach to his predecessor, George W Bush, in dealings with Iran, famously offering an “extended hand” to Tehran if it “unclenched its fist.”

This failed, however, and Iran has since dramatically expanded its programme, enriching uranium to purities of 20 per cent, a level within spitting distance, technically speaking, of the 90 per cent needed for a nuclear weapon.

As a result, talk of war has increased and the UN Security Council has imposed more sanctions on Iran. Additional US and EU restrictions targeting Iran’s oil sector are due to come into force from July 1.

But now, both sides “have walked up to the abyss and they have both decided they don’t want to go down it,” said Trita Parsi, author of an acclaimed recent book about Obama’s dealings with Iran called “A Single Roll of the Dice.”

Obama, seeking re-election in November against a Republican challenger accusing him of dawdling over Iran and keen to oil prices come down, is impatient for results, while Iran is feeling the pinch from the sanctions.

The P5+1 and Iran met in Istanbul in mid-April and managed to find enough common ground to come to Baghdad, with both sides hailing what they said was a fresh approach from the other.

But the Baghdad meeting will put these renewed efforts at rapprochement to the test as they seek to set the parameters of what will be a lengthy and arduous process of compromise requiring hitherto unseen amounts of patience and trust.

One key way for Iran to win the confidence of the P5+1 will be a suspension of 20-per cent enrichment, while another would be Iran shipping its stockpiles of enriched uranium abroad.

What might also help is Iran implementing the additional protocol (AP) of the nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, which allows for more intrusive inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

The IAEA also wants Iran to address allegations made in its November report that until 2003, and possibly since, Tehran had a “structured programme” of “activities relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device.”

IAEA chief Yukiya Amano said on Tuesday after talks in Tehran that a deal on ways to go over these accusations with the Iranians would be signed “quite soon.”

The reaction of Western diplomats, and Israel, was cool, however.

But Iran will likely be disappointed if it expects to see sanctions relief in return for any of these moves, with the most it can hope for being a pledge, with strings attached, not to impose any more, diplomats said.

In any case, it is far from certain that any firm promises will be made by either side in Baghdad, with one envoy playing down expectations by saying that even if the talks go well, the results might not be “tangible.”

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.