A picture released by the official website of the Iranian presidency shows President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad delivering a speech to the Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation scientists during a ceremony to mark National Nuclear Day in Tehran on April 8, 2012.          – Photo by AFP

ISTANBUL: Western powers and Iran are meeting again Saturday to hash out Tehran’s promised “new initiatives” on its nuclear activities, albeit with little hope in the West for a breakthrough in the deadlock.

“The Iranian delegation will have new initiatives and we hope that the other party will have a constructive approach,” said Iran’s top negotiator in nuclear talks Wednesday, raising hopes that Tehran might have a plan to change dynamics.

What Tehran will bring to the table Saturday, however, remained unclear after Saeed Jalili’s words, but the fact that the talks were starting again after a 15-month break is seen in its own right as a crucial opportunity to lower the tension.

But do not get too many illusions, warns a senior European diplomat, pointing to a lack of “positive signals” from Tehran that compromises will be made to finally lift off Western fears surrounding Iran's nuclear activities.

The so-called P5+1 powers, permanent UN Security Council members Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States plus Germany, suspect that Iran’s nuclear programme is aimed at concealing its real purpose of producing atomic weapons.

They have imposed increasingly severe economic sanctions on the Islamic republic to pressure it to halt activities, notably uranium enrichment, moves that instead pushed Iran to accelerate its nuclear pursuit, which it says has no military dimensions.

Angered by the pressure, Tehran announced on Wednesday that it was halting oil exports to EU nations, a move that was portrayed in Iran as pre-emptive punishment against the West for imposing an oil embargo on the Islamic republic that is to come into full effect on July 1.

Earlier this week, Washington noted that they have no problem with Iran’s production of peaceful, civilian nuclear power, as long as it can prove that and satisfy the world that it does not intend to make weapons.

“From our perspective, it’s relatively straightforward, if in fact their program is purely peaceful, for them to be able to demonstrate it to everybody's satisfaction,” State Department Spokesperson Victoria Nuland stated.

For Iran’s part, the aim of the talks was that “Iran gain its rights and the P5+1 have its stated concerns alleviated” over Tehran’s nuclear programme, according to Iran’s foreign minister, Ali Akbar Salehi.

Those rights include access to peaceful nuclear energy for Tehran, which sees uranium enrichment as a “right” that cannot be taken away, and wants to keep its military sites off-limits to atomic energy inspections, triggering fears that Iran is indeed trying to produce nuclear warheads.

Regarding the Western imposed pressure, Jalili spelled out clearly that more pressure “only reinforces the determination of the Iranian people,” in pursuing their nuclear project.

As for the P5+1, what brought Iran to resume diplomacy was nevertheless the pressure itself, according to the European diplomat.

“The fact is that every time we take another step in sanctions against Iran, they suddenly wake up and say they are ready to discuss,” he told AFP on condition of anonymity. “There has got to be a link between the two.”

The Western powers want Iran to stop enriching uranium to 20 per cent and ship out its existing stocks, and open itself up to more intense inspections by the UN nuclear watchdog.

In response, Tehran says the target should be a nuclear weapon-free Middle East, a clear reference to the undeclared arsenal of its arch-enemy Israel, which it says should be subject to the same inspections.

The antagonism between the Jewish state and the Islamic republic also gets its share from the nuclear negotiations, according to the senior diplomat.

“Many believe that, at least, as long as negotiations continue it will be difficult for Israel to launch a military offensive against Iranian nuclear facilities,” he said.

“But then again, if Israel decides to go there nothing will stop it from doing so.”

Israel, which sees a possible Iranian nuclear weapon as a threat to its very existence, claims Iran may be on the cusp of “break-out” capability, when it could quickly build a nuclear weapon, and does not rule out a pre-emptive strike of its own.

The last round of talks between Iran and P5+1 was held in Istanbul January, 2011, considered neutral ground by all parties, but failed to produce results.

Opinion

Editorial

Border clashes
19 May, 2024

Border clashes

THE Pakistan-Afghanistan frontier has witnessed another series of flare-ups, this time in the Kurram tribal district...
Penalising the dutiful
19 May, 2024

Penalising the dutiful

DOES the government feel no remorse in burdening honest citizens with the cost of its own ineptitude? With the ...
Students in Kyrgyzstan
Updated 19 May, 2024

Students in Kyrgyzstan

The govt ought to take a direct approach comprising convincing communication with the students and Kyrgyz authorities.
Ominous demands
Updated 18 May, 2024

Ominous demands

The federal government needs to boost its revenues to reduce future borrowing and pay back its existing debt.
Property leaks
18 May, 2024

Property leaks

THE leaked Dubai property data reported on by media organisations around the world earlier this week seems to have...
Heat warnings
18 May, 2024

Heat warnings

STARTING next week, the country must brace for brutal heatwaves. The NDMA warns of severe conditions with...