President Hosni Mubarak’s early exit could raise electoral complications, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said. -Photo by AP

WASHINGTON: The timetable of President Hosni Mubarak’s departure lies with the Egyptian people but his early exit could raise electoral complications, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said.

Under pressure from mass protests, Mubarak has pledged to step down after September polls but many demonstrators want his immediate departure and US news reports have suggested Washington was also pressuring him to quit now.

However, Clinton, speaking to reporters Sunday on the way back from international talks on Egypt in Germany, stressed that Mubarak’s fate was not up to the United States.

“That has to be up to the Egyptian people,” the chief US diplomat said when asked if reality dictated Mubarak play some role in the political transition toward free and fair elections in Egypt.

“As I understand the constitution, if the president were to resign, he would be succeeded by the speaker of the house, and presidential elections would have to be held in 60 days,” she said.

“Now the Egyptians are going to have to grapple with the reality of what they must do,” she said.

Clinton said, for example, that she had heard a leader from the opposition Muslim Brotherhood as well as leading dissident Mohammed ElBaradei say “it’s going to take time” to organize elections.

“That’s not us saying it. It’s them saying it,” she said.

President Barack Obama, meanwhile, also emphasized Egypt’s political transition when pressed in an interview Sunday on Fox television whether Mubarak was going to quit now.

“Only he knows what he’s going to do. Here’s what we know, is that Egypt is not going to go back to what it was,” Obama said.

“He’s not running for re-election. His term is up this year,” he added.

Clinton said retired diplomat Frank Wisner, whom Obama sent to Mubarak with a message last week, did “not speak for the administration” when he said the Egyptian leader should stay in office during the transition.

She, like other members of the administration, have distanced themselves from Wisner’s remarks but have not actually said he was wrong.

“President Mubarak’s continued leadership is critical,” Wisner told the Munich Security Conference, the same one Clinton attended.

“It’s his opportunity to write his own legacy. He has given 60 years of his life to the service of his country, this is an ideal moment for him to show the way forward,” Wisner said.

Former US vice president Dick Cheney also praised Mubarak as a “good friend” to United States, pointing out that Americans needed to “remember that.”

Clinton declined to comment on talks that Omar Suleiman, Mubarak’s first vice president in three decades of rule, held Sunday with the Muslim Brotherhood.

She said it was up to Egyptians to decide whether the brotherhood’s participation in the transition gave the process credibility.

“There are organizations and individuals whose participation will give credibility in the eyes of some Egyptians and concerns in the eyes of other Egyptians,” said Clinton.

Clinton also said Egyptians will have to clear a number of hurdles in order to stage elections in September.

For example, they would have to determine how to “amend the constitution to bring it more in line with the kind of democracy and political system” they seek, and set a deadline for reaching such a goal.

They would have to establish an electoral system that includes voter registration rolls.

She said the United States, European and other countries were ready to offer the expertise to help prepare for the elections.

“We’re going to try to work with a lot of like-minded countries around the world to offer whatever assistance we can,” she said. “We have experts in holding credible elections, we have experts in writing constitutions.”

“This is important, to look over the horizon. You don’t want to get to September, have a failed election, and then people feel ... what was the point of it.”

Asked if seven months were enough time, she replied: “It’s up to them. But I think, with a concerted effort, with the kind of timelines and concrete steps I’m calling for, it could be done.

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...