MOSCOW, July 28: Conspiracy theories about the bombings that swept Russia in 1999, killing some 300 people, and which helped to spark the second Chechen war, have gained new ground after the revelations of a former Russian intelligence agent.

The Russian authorities insist that separatist Chechen rebels were behind the series of devastating apartment block blasts in September 1999 — two in Moscow, and one each in the southern Russian cities of Volgodonsk and Buynaksk.

But Alexander Litvinenko, a Russian agent now exiled in Britain, on Friday presented testimony from Achimez Gochiayev, the chief suspect for the attacks, as fresh proof that the FSB (former KGB) secret service was behind the blasts.

In a declaration distributed to journalists, Gochiyaev says that a school friend he believes to be an FSB agent advised him to rent underground premises beneath four apartment buildings in Moscow for commercial purposes.

Two of these buildings were destroyed in explosions on September 9 and 13, 1999, killing more than 200 people.

After the second blast on September 13, Gochiyaev says he warned the police of the risks of further attacks in the other buildings and they discovered explosives there.

The FSB claims that Gochiyaev, from the North Caucausus republic of Karachayevo-Cherkessia, was working for Chechen warlords Shamil Basayev and Khattab, who have been accused of masterminding the deadly bombing campaign in Russia. On Friday it released photographs showing Gochiyaev next to Basayev.

Litvinenko’s and Gochiyaev’s charges against the FSB met with some skepticism from Sergei Kovalev, lawmaker and former Soviet dissident, who heads the independent team investigating the attacks and who dismissed their evidence as “insufficient at this stage.”

However, some experts are convinced that the conspiracy theory has some truth to it.

“Litvinenko’s accusations are not unfounded. Chechen rebels were incapable of organising a series of bombings without help from high-ranking Moscow officials,” former KGB colonel Konstantin Preobrazhensky said.—AFP

Opinion

Editorial

Sustainable path?
Updated 13 Jun, 2026

Sustainable path?

The FY27 budget is the first clear signal that the government is ready to transition from stabilisation to growth.
Prioritising education
13 Jun, 2026

Prioritising education

THOUGH the improvement in the country’s literacy rate may be slight, as highlighted by the Economic Survey, it ...
Poverty’s rise
13 Jun, 2026

Poverty’s rise

AS attention turns to the government’s plans for the coming fiscal year, one set of figures deserves particular...
A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...