DES MOINES, June 8: US President George W. Bush put election-year pressure on the Democratic-led Senate on Friday to make permanent a major element of his tax cut package by ensuring estate taxes were “forever buried.”

On the first anniversary of the signing of his $1.35 trillion, 10-year tax cut, the Republican president called for more relief, railing against “the death tax” — which Congress temporarily repealed — as unfair and nonsensical.

But he was stumped when it came to explaining why its repeal was not permanent under the bill he signed at the White House a year ago.

Finally we repealed the death tax but because of a quirk in the law that repeal isn’t permanent, Bush told farmers, community leaders and visitors to the 14th World Expo in Des Moines. It’s hard for me to explain why they repealed it but didn’t repeal it.

Under the law he signed, the estate tax gradually would go down from 55 per cent to 45 per cent — with the value of exempt estates rising to $3.5 million — until it disappears in 2010.

But Bush’s tax cut expires at the end of 2010 and without congressional action, the estate tax along with other taxes would be reinstated in 2011.

Republican backers of repeal argued it would be unfair to reinstate the estate tax after eliminating it for a short period of time.

Democrats argue that eliminating the estate tax would benefit the wealthiest of Americans while reducing federal revenues that could be used to help shore up the finances of Social Security or pay for a prescription drug program for elderly Americans.

It makes no sense to tax a person’s assets twice, and it makes no sense to have a tax that drives people off the farm, Bush said. For the good of American agriculture, let’s make sure that death tax is forever buried and forever done away with.

Bush also touched on other parts of his domestic agenda, including trade and energy policy that he argued would ensure a strong economy, along with tax cuts.

I believe that when you let a person keep his or her own money, they’re going to spend it, he said. And when they spend it, it increases demands for goods and services.

And with an increase of demand for goods and services, somebody has got to produce that good and service.

Despite new data showing the US unemployment rate fell to 5.8 per cent in May from 6 per cent in April, Bush said he was not satisfied.—Reuters

Opinion

Editorial

Sustainable path?
Updated 13 Jun, 2026

Sustainable path?

The FY27 budget is the first clear signal that the government is ready to transition from stabilisation to growth.
Prioritising education
13 Jun, 2026

Prioritising education

THOUGH the improvement in the country’s literacy rate may be slight, as highlighted by the Economic Survey, it ...
Poverty’s rise
13 Jun, 2026

Poverty’s rise

AS attention turns to the government’s plans for the coming fiscal year, one set of figures deserves particular...
A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...