ISLAMABAD, June 13: Pakistan People's Party (PPP) has rejected the contention of the Senate chairman, Muhammadmian Soomro, that no question can be asked about the Sindh governor on the floor of the House.

The PPP had asked for details of criminal cases filed against Ishratul Ibad before his appointment as governor, their present status and whether the cases were withdrawn and, if so, why were these withdrawn.

In a letter to Senator Farhatullah Babar, Mr Soomro ruled that his question was about a sitting governor who was a representative of the president. "A question about the conduct of any such dignitary is barred by the provision of rule 47 (XViii) (a) of the Rules of Business," the letter said.

The PPP challenges this interpretation as there was no sub clause (a) to Rule 47 (XViii) in the Rules of Business on the basis of which the question was killed, said Senator Farhatullah Babar in a statement here on Sunday.

Rule 47 (XViii) which had no sub clause barred only questions, which contained reflections on court decisions, he said. There was no reference to governor or anybody else in this rule, he said.

Senator Babar said there was sub clause (a) in Rule 47 (XViii) under which questions reflecting on the conduct of the president, or a foreign head of state or a judge of the superior court could not be asked. "Even this did not forbid asking question about a provincial governor."

"The lackadaisical and non-chalant manner in which a serious question is disallowed on the basis of an imaginary and non- existent rule is mind-boggling". It only demonstrates that the Senate is being conducted as a personal Jagir rather than the elected Upper House of the federation, he said.

It is a novel interpretation that the immunity given to the president should also be deemed to apply to the governors on the ground that they are representatives of the president.

"By disallowing the question the Senate chairman has transgressed his powers and authority to cover up the criminal past of a sitting governor," senator Babar said. Mr Babar said the harder the rulers tried to cover up the criminal past of state functionaries the harder the PPP would expose them before the bar of the enlightened public opinion.

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...