GENEVA, April 23: The United Nations' top human rights forum on Friday adopted a softly worded text on atrocities allegedly committed in Sudan's Darfur region and refused to vote on a US demand for stronger action.

But the United States demanded a special session of the Commission on Human Rights upon the return of a UN team from Sudan, where it is investigating charges of attacks by Sudanese troops and Arab militias on black African civilians, in what could constitute war crimes.

Fifty member states approved the mildly-worded document drawn up as a compromise between the European Union and a bloc of African nations. Washington rejected the text, and there were two abstentions.

Frustrated by the decision, the US delegation head Richard Williamson said a second vote be taken on an original, stronger draft resolution proposed earlier by the European Union and co-sponsored by the United States. -AFP

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

MATTERS have worsened in the stand-off between the Azad Kashmir government and the Joint Awami Action Committee,...
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...