WASHINGTON, Jan 28: “Some level of stability, no safe havens, reasonable development… nuclear weapons not a significant concern in Pakistan,” said America’s top military official when asked what would constitute success for him in the South Asian region.

Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman US Joint Chiefs of Staff, made the observation while defining America’s national security strategy at a briefing for Washington-based foreign journalists.

The admiral underlined the current situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan as the biggest threat confronting the United States and said that within those two countries, the presence of terrorist elements in Fata was the main cause of concern for Washington.

“And with respect to Al-Qaeda, the biggest concern we have with respect to them is the existence of them in the Fata and Pakistan,” he said.

The United States, he said, wanted to make sure that the safe havens were eliminated and were not recreated in Afghanistan or some other place like Somalia or Yemen.

Admiral Mullen appeared particularly concerned about Afghanistan where he said “the situation… grows increasingly perilous every day”.

The admiral also emphasised the need for developing a regional strategy for defeating terrorism in Afghanistan.

REGIONAL APPROACH: A regional approach, he said, was critical and it should include not just Afghanistan and Pakistan but also Iran and India.

“India plays an important role here. And certainly Iran, as a bordering state, plays a role as well,” he said. “It is important to engage Iran. Iran is unhelpful in many, many ways in many, many areas.”

He said although he was not “overly optimistic” about the success of this regional approach either, “there are mutual interests and I think that that might offer some possibilities.”

Responding to a question about why was Pakistan concerned about India’s expanding role in Afghanistan, Admiral Mullen noted that there’s “certainly a historic tension” between Pakistan and India.

This tension, he said, had “accentuated greatly” as the result of the Mumbai attacks. But “I am comforted that the strategic leadership in both Pakistan and India has been such that we have not had any kind of conflict break out as a result of Mumbai,” he added.

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...