TOKYO, June 3: Nepal’s Maoist chief has ruled out renouncing armed struggle but said a return to violence was unlikely after the former rebels achieved their goal of ending the world’s last Hindu monarchy.

The Maoists, who waged a decade-long insurgency that left more than 13,000 people dead, won a convincing election victory for a special assembly that last week voted to dethrone King Gyanendra.

In an interview published on Tuesday, Prachanda, whose nom de guerre means “The Fierce One,” said that the election showed that the Nepalese people wanted “peace and change.” “I don’t think there will be any kind of necessity to use arms again,” he told Japan’s Yomiuri Shimbun.

But he refused to renounce the right of armed struggle by the Maoists, who have 31,000 fighters in UN-monitored camps across the land of Mount Everest.

“It doesn’t mean nobody should take arms to resist oppression of the government or something like that. I can’t predict that,” he said.

The Maoists have called for their guerrillas to be brought into Nepal’s army, formerly a bastion of royalist support.

But Nepal’s army, while pledging to respect the decision to abolish the monarchy, has said it would be impossible for indoctrinated leftist guerrillas to integrate into the 90,000-strong force.

The United States, which supplied arms to Nepal to fight the rebels, continues to classify the Maoists as terrorists, thereby restricting the group’s travel and financial transactions.

Washington has repeatedly called on the Maoists to stop violence and intimidation and rein in their dreaded youth league.

But in a shift, the United States has held talks with Prachanda, a former schoolteacher whose real name is Pushpa Kamal Dahal and who spent more than two decades underground.

Prachanda, whose rebels were long sharply critical of the West and neighbouring India, said he wanted “a diplomatic relationship” with the United States.

“I think the US is going to change its attitude and policy. They are trying to understand the real dynamics of our country,” he said.

“Slowly, gradually, they are taking more pragmatic steps.”

—AFP

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...