Shandur pasture’s inclusion in disputed territories opposed

Published Updated
0

CHITRAL: Residents of Laspur Valley in Upper Chitral have opposed the inclusion of Shandur pasture in the list of territorial disputes between Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) and Gilgit-Baltistan (GB), maintaining that the issue should not be linked with the Babusar Pass and Diamer-Bhasha Dam boundary disputes.

In a joint statement issued after a meeting of local elders and notables in Laspur, community representatives said reports of a recent meeting between the KP governor and GB chief minister in Islamabad had caused widespread concern and anxiety across Chitral.

The statement maintained that Shandur had remained an integral part of Chitral since the reign of Sumalik in 1240AD, with its boundaries remaining unchanged during the successive Raees, Khushwaqt and Katur dynasties.

Elders say govt should resolve issues, not create new ones

“The 1975 Land Commission also upheld the existing boundary, while Shandur is officially recorded as part of Chitral in the Revenue Department’s records,” the statement said. It added that the KP fisheries and forest departments had continuously administered the Shandur watershed.

The elders said a clearly established boundary already existed between Ghizer and Laspur at Langar. They pointed out that nearly 800 households from Laspur lived in the area and maintained their places of worship there.

Urging the authorities to exercise restraint, the elders called upon the GB chief minister and KP governor to examine the relevant official records and obtain comprehensive briefings from departments concerned before taking any decision on the sensitive issue.

They stressed that the government’s primary responsibility was to resolve existing disputes and public concerns rather than create circumstances that could fuel tensions.

Reaffirming the importance of the existing boundary at Langar, the elders described it as a symbol of brotherhood and peaceful coexistence between the people of Upper Chitral and Ghizer and cautioned against turning it into a source of controversy.

They warned that the people of Laspur would resist any decision they considered unjust and demanded that local communities from both Laspur and Ghizer be taken into confidence to develop a consensus before any official action was taken.

Published in Dawn, November 15th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Muddled hierarchy
Updated 15 Nov, 2026

Muddled hierarchy

The jurisdiction of the two courts and a mechanism for settling disputes between them should be spelt out in law, not left to judges to fight over.
Growing crisis
15 Nov, 2026

Growing crisis

AN emergency can be judged by the speed with which it draws an effective response. The National Population Council’s...
Organised rackets
15 Nov, 2026

Organised rackets

ON the International Day against Transnational Organised Crime, observed today, Pakistan finds itself in a tight...
Referendum talk
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Referendum talk

Unless the PPP is deliberately using Sindh as a bargaining chip, it should issue a clarification with a clear, consistent position on new administrative units, not one tailored to protect its home turf.
Mineral wealth
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Mineral wealth

Minerals should not be presented as a solution to Pakistan’s long-term economic difficulties. The aim should be to build an industrial base rather than export raw materials.
Late diagnosis
14 Nov, 2026

Late diagnosis

AS we mark World Diabetes Day today, Pakistan faces a troubling question: how many people are living with diabetes...