Imaan, Hadi’s pleas seeking early hearing adjourned

Published
0
human rights lawyer Imaan Mazari (right) with her husband Hadi Ali Chattha during a court hearing.—AFP/file
human rights lawyer Imaan Mazari (right) with her husband Hadi Ali Chattha during a court hearing.—AFP/file

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Thursday adjourned until Sept 17 the applications filed by rights activists Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, observing that either the court would decide the matter or the applicants would withdraw the case.

A two-member Supreme Court bench, headed by Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan and comprising Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim, took up the applications, which were filed through senior counsel Faisal Siddiqi on behalf of the applicants. They sought directives for an early hearing of their criminal appeal challenging the Islamabad High Court’s (IHC) Feb 19, 2026, refusal to suspend their 17-year sentences in the controversial social media posts case.

The counsel contended that the Supreme Court had earlier directed the IHC to decide the appeals seeking suspension of sentence within two weeks, but the case had now suddenly been scheduled for Sept 8 in the high court.

“Whenever the Supreme Court commences hearing on the applicants’ applications, the high court fixes the matter,” the counsel said, expressing apprehension that the case might disappear from the system since the cause list had not yet been issued by the high court.

At this, Justice Afghan observed that the system should be allowed to be “fully exposed”, adding that the case might disappear from the system, “but we are not.”

“Don’t worry, we are here. We will be here in the future as long as we are alive,” Justice Afghan observed.

Additional Attorney General (AAG) Rana Asad, however, said the high court had its own system for fixing cases and that matters were scheduled accordingly.

Justice Afghan remarked that it would be better not to ask the Supreme Court for any opinion on the high court’s system.

The AAG said the annual vacation of the high court would end on Sept 6, after which it would resume official work. He added that the applications seeking suspension of sentence were not maintainable.

Earlier, on July 21, the Supreme Court had adjourned the hearing in the controversial social media posts case on the grounds that the high court had already fixed the application seeking suspension of sentence in the main appeal for July 24.

Published in Dawn, August 21st, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Restructuring plans
Updated 10 Nov, 2026

Restructuring plans

It would be a much wiser move, politically speaking, to take up any debate on administrative restructuring again after the next general election.
Extreme heat
Updated 10 Nov, 2026

Extreme heat

Climate adaptation is yet to find a place in our agricultural policies.
Israel power struggle
10 Nov, 2026

Israel power struggle

A POWER struggle is emerging after last month’s elections in Israel resulted in no party securing the requisite...
Antalya agenda
Updated 09 Nov, 2026

Antalya agenda

For Pakistan, the priority should be to secure easier access to climate funds, more grants rather than debt-creating loans, and clear deadlines for financial contributions.
Beyond viewership
09 Nov, 2026

Beyond viewership

PAKISTAN has an enormous appetite for online content. According to the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority, it...
Rabid Modi
Updated 09 Nov, 2026

Rabid Modi

Modi’s silence throughout his reign of fear shows his endorsement of hate.