Pentagon chief spars with lawmakers over Iran war

Published April 30, 2026
Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth testifies before the US House Armed Services Committee on Capitol Hill.—AFP
Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth testifies before the US House Armed Services Committee on Capitol Hill.—AFP

WASHINGTON: US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth repeatedly clashed with Democratic lawmakers over the Iran conflict on Wednesday, in his first testimony to Congress since President Donald Trump launched the war more than two months ago.

Appearing before the House Armed Services Committee, Heg­seth quickly struck a combative tone, saying in his opening remarks that the main challenge at this point is the “defeatist words of Democrats and some Republicans.”

Representative Adam Smith — the committee’s top Democrat — took aim at the regional fallout from the war and its toll on both US troops as well as civilians, saying he wanted answers on where the conflict is going and “the plan to achieve our objectives.”

He later asked Hegseth how the “lethal, kinetic action” of the war could be turned into an improvement when it comes to Iran’s nuclear program, which Washington is seeking to eliminate. Hegseth responded by taking aim at the “very bad” nuclear agreement that Trump scrapped during his first term in office.

John Garamendi, another Democrat, accused Hegseth of “lying to the American public about this war from day one” describing what is happening in the Middle East as a “geopolitical calamity, a strategic blunder, resulting in worldwide economic crisis.”

“During the 60 days of Trump’s Iran war, critical munitions have been expended at an alarming rate, depleting magazine levels below what is thought necessary to hold China at bay,” said Garamendi, also describing the conflict as a “quagmire.”

Hegseth pushed back, asking Garamendi “who are you cheering for here?” and saying that calling the war a quagmire was “handing propaganda to our enemies.”

Democratic Representative Seth Moulton asked Hegseth if he advised Trump to attack Iran — a question Hegseth declined to answer, though he later said he thought doing so was “a good idea.”

Asked by Moulton if he had considered the risk of Iran closing the vital Strait of Hormuz if it was attacked, Hegseth said the Pentagon “looked at all aspects of this risk.”

Hegseth was also pressed on the cost of the conflict, which he said was estimated at less than $25 billion so far.

The Pentagon chief then asked the committee: “What is it worth to ensure that Iran never gets a nuclear weapon?”

Published in Dawn, April 30th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Climate choices
Updated 15 Jun, 2026

Climate choices

The country is confronting increasingly volatile weather patterns with consequences for agriculture, infrastructure, public health and economic planning.
Brief opening
15 Jun, 2026

Brief opening

WE have been here before. Throughout the weekend, there was great anticipation that a tentative framework for peace...
Environmental disaster
15 Jun, 2026

Environmental disaster

IT was a heartbreaking sight. A recent news report in these pages carried a picture of a sea turtle lying half ...
Budget presser
Updated 14 Jun, 2026

Budget presser

If the FBR falters, the government will find itself in hot water sooner rather than later.
Muharram precautions
14 Jun, 2026

Muharram precautions

WITH Muharram due to start next week, the authorities have already begun annual exercises to ensure that the ...
Blood bequests
14 Jun, 2026

Blood bequests

WORLD Blood Donor Day offers a moment of “gratitude, advocacy and renewed commitment” for thalassaemia patients...