US Senate rejects vote to avert govt shutdown

Published
0
US Senators Roger Wicker (R-MS) and Jerry Moran (R-KS) use the US Capitol subway system, as members of Congress work to resolve a dispute over immigration enforcement and avert a looming partial government shutdown, on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, US on January 29, 2026. — Reuters
US Senators Roger Wicker (R-MS) and Jerry Moran (R-KS) use the US Capitol subway system, as members of Congress work to resolve a dispute over immigration enforcement and avert a looming partial government shutdown, on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, US on January 29, 2026. — Reuters

WASHINGTON: A US government funding shutdown looked increasingly certain on Thursday after Senate Democrats rejected a key procedural vote to express anger over the killing of two protesters against President Donald Trump’s hardline immigration crackdown.

The failure to approve a six-bill spending package intended to fund more than three-quarters of the federal government makes a partial shutdown starting on Saturday almost impossible to avoid, although Democrats and the White House were still frantically seeking a last-minute deal.

It would be the second shutdown — when funding for swaths of the US government are temporarily frozen — since Trump took office a year ago.

Democrats had vowed to block the measure unless funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is peeled away and renegotiated to include guardrails on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the most generously funded US law-enforcement agency.

That left the chamber’s 53 Republicans short of the 60 votes needed to advance the legislation towards final passage, leaving Washington bracing for another disruptive shutdown as negotiations slide toward Friday night’s midnight deadline.

“What ICE is doing… it is state-sanctioned thuggery and it must stop. And Congress has the authority — and the moral obligation — to act,” said Senate Democratic Minority Leader Chuck Schumer ahead of the vote.

The test vote wasn’t even close in the end, as a modest Republican revolt — driven by a grab bag of grievances — joined Democrats in delivering a decisive 55-45 rejection of the package.

If funding lapses, hundreds of thousands of public employees could be placed on leave or forced to work without pay, with economic disruption rippling outward.

The standoff — which comes with particularly high stakes in a year in which the entire House and around a third of the Senate are up for reelection in the midterms — has been triggered by an incendiary row over immigration enforcement.

Alex Pretti, an intensive care unit nurse protesting Trump’s deportation efforts in the northern city of Minneapolis, was shot dead Saturday by border patrol agents — just weeks after immigration officers killed another activist, Renee Good, blocks away.

‘Talks are ongoing’

Schumer has demanded that DHS funding be split off from the broader spending package and addressed separately, paired with new legal limits on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and related agencies.

Democrats say they are prepared to pass the other five bills immediately — covering departments such as defense, health, education, transportation and financial services — if Republicans agree to that separation.

Democrats are pushing particularly for an end to roving ICE patrols, tightening requirements for search warrants, establishing a universal code of conduct governing the use of force, prohibiting officers from wearing masks and mandating body cameras and proper identification.

Republican leaders have resisted splitting the package, arguing that altering the legislation would slow passage and risk triggering the very shutdown Democrats say they want to avoid.

The House and Senate both have to approve the exact same bill texts before they can become law. But the House is on a break. Lawmakers have raised concerns about the consequences of a DHS shutdown for agencies such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) during severe winter weather.

The White House has become more directly involved in the negotiations as the vote approaches, according to US media, with Trump aides exploring whether a temporary DHS funding extension could defuse the crisis.

Published in Dawn, January 30th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Perilous misstep
Updated 12 Oct, 2026

Perilous misstep

If the authorities felt terrorism was increasing in some tribal districts and adjoining areas, they could have limited themselves to imposing a targeted emergency under Article 232.
Import fraud
12 Oct, 2026

Import fraud

THE under-invoicing of imports from China is not an allegation. It is an open secret in Pakistan’s markets — one...
Paralysed prisons
12 Oct, 2026

Paralysed prisons

PAKISTAN’S overcrowded jails distort the intention of imprisonment — rehabilitation, education, and occupational...
Parliament’s place
Updated 11 Oct, 2026

Parliament’s place

In 2015, the parliament had decided to “maintain neutrality in the Yemen conflict so as to be able to play a proactive diplomatic role to end the crisis”.
Disturbing the peace
11 Oct, 2026

Disturbing the peace

THIS year’s Nobel Peace Prize is well-earned. The winner, South African jurist Dr Navi Pillay, has had an...