12 sent to prison for rioting during Sindhi Culture Day rally

Published December 10, 2025
A file photo of a pair of hands in handcuffs. — AFP/File
A file photo of a pair of hands in handcuffs. — AFP/File

KARACHI: A judicial magistrate sent 12 suspects to prison in a rioting case on Tuesday after a sessions court overturned his decision to extend their physical remand.

On Dec 8, a court had handed the 12 suspects over to police on a one-day physical remand after the administrative judge of the anti-terrorism courts (ATC) had removed the provision of the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) invoked by the police in the FIR registered against them, as well as hundreds of participants of a Sindhi Culture Day rally that turned violent near the FTC flyover on Sharea Faisal on Dec 7.

The police had apprehended the 12 suspects for allegedly violating a ban imposed under Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC).

After the end of their first remand, IO Inspector Sajid produced the suspects before Judicial Magistrate (South) Zahid Ali on Tuesday and pleaded for an extension in their physical remand.

Various lawyers appeared on behalf of the suspects and submitted that it was a simple case of violation of Section 144 of the CrPC, for which a case can only be registered under Section 188 of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) with permission of the state/higher authorities.

The lawyers asked the magistrate to discharge the suspects under Section 63 (discharge of person apprehended) of the CrPC.

After hearing the parties concerned, the magistrate allowed the request of the IO for an extension in their custody, and again handed them over to the police on a three-day physical remand.

However, the defence lawyers challenged the order before Additional District and Sessions Judge (South) Irshad Hussain, who overturned the impugned order and remanded back the matter to the magistrate with directions to pass a fresh order in accordance with law after hearing both sides.

Therefore, the suspects were again produced before the magistrate, and their lawyers insisted on having them discharged, while the IO and prosecutor strongly opposed it and pleaded for their custody.

After hearing both sides, the magistrate sent the suspects to prison on judicial remand and directed the IO to complete the investigation and file a report.

The lawyers chanted slogans for not setting the suspects free as soon as the magistrate remanded them to prison. Subsequently, they have filed post-arrest bail applications before a sessions court.

Published in Dawn, December 10th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

A costly cut
Updated 22 Jun, 2026

A costly cut

Climate risks are increasing and public investment should reflect that reality.
Guarded access
22 Jun, 2026

Guarded access

ONE of the government’s ‘novel’ proposals to snag tax evaders has collided with some harsh realities. On...
Lyari’s passion
22 Jun, 2026

Lyari’s passion

THE love for football in Lyari knows no bounds. The World Cup might be underway thousands of miles away in North...
Unquiet Lebanon
Updated 21 Jun, 2026

Unquiet Lebanon

Either Israel must silence its guns and withdraw from all of Lebanon, or face isolation and boycott from the international community.
Mothers at risk
21 Jun, 2026

Mothers at risk

FOR years, efforts to reduce maternal deaths have focused heavily on postpartum haemorrhage — the severe bleeding...
Political budget
21 Jun, 2026

Political budget

THE KP budget does not read like a document of a province getting its fiscal house in order. Revenue is projected at...