Stale methods

Published

THE state’s lawfare against journalists to mute free speech has contributed to the existing atmosphere of intimidation in the country, besides undermining the government’s credibility. In the latest instance, an anti-terrorism court has decided to indict journalist Matiullah Jan in a drugs case on Oct 31; his trial in an alleged narcotics smuggling and terrorism case begins on that date. Mr Jan was charged last year with possessing narcotics as well as offences under the Anti-Terrorism Act, which included assaulting a policeman. The development has stoked outrage among journalists and rights activists who have not only condemned the “fabricated and concocted case of drug trafficking” and demanded its “immediate quashment” but also urged the prime minister and the chief justices of the top court and the IHC to intervene, to allow journalists to work in an atmosphere free of fear. But the merits of dialogue and tolerance are lost on the rulers.

Punjab Information Minister Azma Bokhari, downplaying Mr Jan’s abduction, had accused him of spreading “fake news for dollars”. Yet her contention did not find any space in the FIR. While journalists are used to close shaves, the state must refrain from persistently weaponising the law. The overused playbook of framing defamatory charges makes a mockery of the justice system. When political impulses of unelected elements influence trials, it results in the erosion of authority and trust. Sadly, countless journalists, rights advocates and political activists have endured such treatment. Hence, the clamour for truth, freedom and an end to the harassment of the media heightens with each transgression. This repeated abuse of the law, manipulation of the press, and the muzzling of dissenting voices creates room for false narratives, defeating the purpose of such half-baked efforts. In a climate of political polarisation, suppression and economic challenges, the absence of tolerance exposes insecurity. Liberties must be preserved to save democracy.

Published in Dawn, October 27th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Quid pro quo
Updated 26 Jul, 2026

Quid pro quo

Accepting Israel would mean legitimising its violence against the Palestinians, as well as its neighbouring Arab states and Iran.
AI in government
26 Jul, 2026

AI in government

THE Prime Minister’s Office has announced the introduction of an AI-powered digital system and directed ministries...
Cautious optimism
26 Jul, 2026

Cautious optimism

THE latest polio surveillance figures offer some encouraging news regarding the difficult fight against polio. The...
Rampant lawlessness
Updated 25 Jul, 2026

Rampant lawlessness

THE brutal slaying of a judge and his guard in Mastung is the latest in a series of blood-drenched events that have...
Daily fuel pricing
25 Jul, 2026

Daily fuel pricing

THE government’s move to daily petroleum price adjustments should make fuel pricing more transparent and more...
The drug problem
25 Jul, 2026

The drug problem

WHILE Islamabad Police chase low-level peddlers, the capital’s kingpins have quietly taken their operations ...