Pakistan backs Iran’s right to self-defence

Published June 14, 2025
KARACHI: People hold a demonstration in Mithadar on Friday against Israeli attacks on Iran.—PPI
KARACHI: People hold a demonstration in Mithadar on Friday against Israeli attacks on Iran.—PPI

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan on Friday came out strongly in support of Iran’s right to self-defence, following Israeli military strikes on Iranian targets, distinguishing its position from most other regional and global powers.

The Pakistani position was more than a diplomatic footnote; rather a bold assertion of prin-ciple in a region accustomed to cautious ambiguity.

When the Foreign Office described Isr­­ael’s action as “unjustified and illegitim­a­­te aggression” that violated “the soverei­g­nty and territorial integrity of the Islamic Republic of Iran” and flouted the UN Charter, it did not stop at condemnation.

It explicitly mentioned Article 51: “Iran has the right to self-defence under Article 51 of the UN Charter.” The statement further urged the world to “hold the aggressor accountable for its actions.”

Dar speaks to Iranian foreign minister, assures him of full support

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif added political weight to the chorus of disapproval, condemning “this grave and highly irresponsible act” in the “strongest possible terms” and warning that it “risks further de-stabilising an already volatile region.”

Furthermore, the unanimous resolutions passed by both houses of Parliament left no doubt: “This house stands resolute with our Iranian brothers and their right to defend themselves,” read similarly worded resolutions adopted by the Senate and the National Assembly.

Such clarity is rare, as most capitals have opted for measured language and appeals for de-escalation.

Saudi Arabia denounced the strikes as violations of international law without endorsing any right of retaliation; the UAE voiced “deep concern,” stressing diplomacy over force; Qatar lamented a “dangerous escalation” and Israel’s “illegal policies,” yet stopped short of supporting self-defense; Turkiye criticised the strikes as destabilising and a blow to diplomacy; and India and China both urged restraint while carefully avoiding blame.

Pakistan, by contrast, broke ranks. Why does this matter? Islamabad’s explicit reliance on Article 51 underscores its own preoccupation with sovereignty - a principle it invokes regularly in its disputes with India.

By championing Iran’s defensive rights, Islamabad is effectively reaffirming its own narrative that any breach of territorial integrity demands a right to respond. In that sense, Pakistan’s stance is as much about reinforcing its own position as it is about solidarity with Tehran.

Domestically, the move resonates with a public narrative that frames Pakistan as a defender of the vulnerable, an identity rooted in both Islamic solidarity and anti-imperialism posture. Politically, it bolsters the government’s credentials among those who view Israel as an “illegitimate entity” responsible for “heinous crimes against Muslim ummah.”

Yet this posture carries risks. Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir’s upcoming visit to Washington, intended to cement strategic ties with the United States, now faces awkward optics.

In a call with Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi on Friday, Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar condemned the blatant Israeli aggression and reiterated Islamabad’s strong support to Iran for the sake of peace in the region.

He also conveyed the deepest sympathies on the loss of many precious lives in Israeli attacks on Iranian territory.

As former Foreign Secretary Aizaz Chaudhry observes, Pakistan will extend “moral and political support to Iran” without anticipating any immediate repercussions of Iran-Israel hostilities; however, the sharp divergence between Isla­mabad’s rhetoric and Washington’s endorsement of Israel’s actions could prove discordant.

Michael Kugelman, a South Asia expert in Washington, warns that “Pakistan’s strong opposition to the Israeli attacks, and given Washington’s expressions of support for the strikes, … Munir here would be bad optics.”

The Pakistani moves reflect Islam­abad’s delicate, foreign policy balancing act — aligning with the United States for strategic, diplomatic and economic support, while upholding a sovereign foreign policy that affirms its principles even when they collide with its allies.

Published in Dawn, June 14th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Immunity gap
26 Apr, 2026

Immunity gap

VACCINES rarely make the headlines unless there is an outbreak. This World Immunisation Week, it is a moment to...
Danger on repeat
26 Apr, 2026

Danger on repeat

DISASTERS have typically been framed as acts of nature. Of late, they look increasingly like tests of preparedness...
Loose lips
26 Apr, 2026

Loose lips

PAKISTANIS have by now gained something of an international reputation for their gallows humour, but it seems that...
Lebanon truce
Updated 25 Apr, 2026

Lebanon truce

THE fact that the truce between Israel and Lebanon has been extended for three weeks should be welcomed. But there...
Terrorism again
25 Apr, 2026

Terrorism again

THE elimination of 22 terrorists in an intelligence-based operation in Khyber highlights both the scale and ...
Taxing technology
25 Apr, 2026

Taxing technology

THE recent decision by the FBR’s Directorate General of Customs Valuation to increase the ‘assessed value’ of...