Gohar hits back at Salman Akram Raja, disputes latter’s claim about ‘avoiding’ meetings in solidarity with Imran’s family members

ISLAMABAD: PTI leaders on Wednesday appeared to be at loggerheads over the question of access to party founder Imran Khan, a day after the jail administration’s decision to bar the former prime minister’s sisters from meeting him ended in a clash with police.

On Tuesday, the Adiala administration had stopped Aleema Khan and other family members, but allowed a group of five lawyers — including Barrister Gohar Ali Khan and Ali Zafar — to meet the PTI chief in jail.

This development did not go down well with Secretary General Salman Akram Raja, who was also not allowed to meet Mr Khan.

The PTI had given a list of six lawyers — as per the high court order that sanctioned two weekly meetings — to the jail administration for the meeting on Tuesday, but Mr Raja’s name was removed from the list and he was stopped by the jail staff.

It may be noted that the Islamabad High Court had ordered that the PTI founder should be able to meet visitors every Tuesday and Thursday, and that the visits would be coordinated by Salman Akram Raja.

In response to this development, the PTI secretary general said on Tuesday night that people whose names were not included in the list should not meet Imran Khan, and as long as Imran Khan’s sisters were not being allowed to meet him, other leaders should also refrain from meeting the former prime minister.

This apparent dig at Barristers Gohar and Ali Zafar did not go down well with the PTI interim chairman, who took the secretary general to the task in a media talk on Wednesday.

“The party has never decided that no one will meet the founding chairman if his sisters will not be allowed to meet him. Moreover, if that is the case why did Salman Akram Raja meet Imran Khan (on March 25) while Aleema Khan and other sisters were not allowed to meet their brother,” he said.

“I am the chairman of Pakistan’s largest political party and have confidence of Imran Khan. I am facing criticism for last one and half years and I appreciate positive criticism but no one should do it for cheap popularity,” he said.

“…the party has not decided that if one lawyer’s name is removed from the list provided to the Adiala administration, others lawyers will not meet Imran Khan either. Moreover, we have not decided that if Imran Khan’s sisters will not be allowed, no lawyer will meet Mr Khan,” he said.

He said the boycott happened only once and that too at the time of the 26th Amendment. “We had provided a list of five lawyers in which Salman’s name was also included, but when we received the approval, there were names of three lawyers and Salman’s name was missing. We decided that either all five would go there or none of us would. The government was of the view that Salman’s name was not included because he was not a parliamentarian…,” he explained.

Banister Gohar said that the political committee never took such a decision after that, adding that the proposal could be tabled in front of the political committee and if it decided in its favour, then no one would meet Imran Khan if his sisters’ access was restricted.

“However, political point-scoring should not be done, and no one should try to gain cheap popularity. No one should speak about Ali Zafar that he is a ‘favourite’ person. He is great person…(he) contested party cases in the Peshawar High Court, the IHC, the Lahore High Court, the Supreme Court, the Election Commission and at other forums without charging even a single rupee,” he claimed.

Parliamentary party meeting

Later, after the meeting of the PTI parliamentary party, leader of the opposition in National Assembly Omar Ayub Khan said that the Pakistan Peoples Party was responsible for the canals which are being made in Punjab. “In July last year a meeting was called in which President Asif Zardari gave approval for the canals under SIFC,” he alleged.

“However, it is the PTI which has raised the issue and said that the water belongs to Sindh and issue should be addressed through Council of Common Interests,” he said.

“Moreover, a mineral conference was held in Islamabad, but I need to tell that the investment comes to those places where peace prevails. We are being told that the cases against PTI can be withdrawn if Imran Khan seeks an apology. It shows that all cases are politically motivated,” he claimed.

Published in Dawn, April 10th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Collective security
Updated 12 Mar, 2026

Collective security

ERASING previously defined ‘red lines’, the brutal US-Israeli war on Iran has brought regional states face to...
Spectrum leap
12 Mar, 2026

Spectrum leap

THE sale of 480 MHz of fifth-generation telecom spectrum for $507m is a major milestone in Pakistan’s digital...
Toxic fallout
12 Mar, 2026

Toxic fallout

WARS can leave environmental scars that remain long after the fighting is over. The strikes on Iran’s oil...
Token austerity
Updated 11 Mar, 2026

Token austerity

The ‘austerity’ measures are a ritualistic response to public anger rather than a sincere attempt to reform state spending.
Lebanon on fire
11 Mar, 2026

Lebanon on fire

WHILE the entire Gulf region has become an active warzone, repercussions of this conflict have spread to the...
Canine crisis
11 Mar, 2026

Canine crisis

KARACHI’S stray dog crisis requires urgent attention. Feral canines can cause serious and lasting physical and...