THE HAGUE: Sudan has filed a case against the United Arab Emirates arguing that the Gulf state is complicit in genocide over its alleged support for Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces, the International Court of Justice announced on Thursday.

Khartoum contends the UAE is “complicit in the genocide on the Masalit (community in Sudan) through its direction of and provision of extensive financial, political, and military support for the rebel RSF militia,” the ICJ said in a statement.

“The United Arab Emirates fuels the rebellion and supports the militia that has committed the crime of genocide in West Darfur,” the Sudan submission to the court said.

The UAE, which has repeatedly denied supporting the RSF, dismissed the case as a “publicity stunt” and said it would try to have it thrown out. The case “is nothing more than a cynical publicity stunt aimed at diverting attention,” a UAE official said in a statement, adding: “The UAE will seek the immediate dismissal of this baseless application.”

UAE dismisses the case as a ‘publicity stunt’

For nearly two years, the RSF and the regular army in Sudan have fought a war that has killed tens of thousands of people and uprooted more than 12 million. Famine has been declared in parts of the country and is likely to spread.

Sudan called on the ICJ, which rules in disputes between countries, to issue emergency orders — “provisional measures” in the court jargon — to force the UAE to pay reparations, among other requests. “The United Arab Emirates must make full reparation for the injury caused (by) its internationally wrongful acts, including paying reimbursement to the victims of the war,” Sudan’s submission argued.

ICJ rulings are legally binding but the court has no power to enforce them. For example, it ordered Russia to halt its assault on Ukraine only a few weeks after the invasion — to no avail.

But Khartoum urged the court to act quickly “to ensure the urgent and fullest possible protection for the Sudanese civilian people who remain at grave and immediate risk of continuing and further acts of genocide.”

‘Ludicrous’

Sudan’s submission accused the RSF of “genocide, murder, theft of property, rape, forcible displacement, trespassing, vandalism of public properties, and violations of human rights.” It added that these acts were “perpetrated and enabled by the direct support given to the rebel RSF militia and related militia groups by the United Arab Emirates.”

Sudan charged that the UAE was breaching its obligations under the 1948 UN Genocide Convention “by attempting to commit genocide, conspiring to commit genocide, inciting genocide, complicity in genocide, and failing to prevent and punish genocide.”

“The allegations presented by the SAF representative at the ICJ lack any legal or factual basis, representing yet another attempt to distract from this calamitous war,” the UAE official said.

Published in Dawn, March 7th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Quid pro quo
Updated 26 Jul, 2026

Quid pro quo

Accepting Israel would mean legitimising its violence against the Palestinians, as well as its neighbouring Arab states and Iran.
AI in government
26 Jul, 2026

AI in government

THE Prime Minister’s Office has announced the introduction of an AI-powered digital system and directed ministries...
Cautious optimism
26 Jul, 2026

Cautious optimism

THE latest polio surveillance figures offer some encouraging news regarding the difficult fight against polio. The...
Rampant lawlessness
Updated 25 Jul, 2026

Rampant lawlessness

THE brutal slaying of a judge and his guard in Mastung is the latest in a series of blood-drenched events that have...
Daily fuel pricing
25 Jul, 2026

Daily fuel pricing

THE government’s move to daily petroleum price adjustments should make fuel pricing more transparent and more...
The drug problem
25 Jul, 2026

The drug problem

WHILE Islamabad Police chase low-level peddlers, the capital’s kingpins have quietly taken their operations ...