LAHORE: A sessions court has awarded the death penalty to a man for committing blasphemy on Thursday.

Shahdara police had registered the FIR in 2020 under section 295 A & C of the PPC on the complaint of Niaz Ahmad Noori, a prayer leader and local emir of Tehreek-i-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP).

The complainant alleged that the accused uttered disrespectful remarks against the Holy Prophet (PBUH).

The former wife of the convict also testified in the trial proceedings and presented an audio recording of the blasphemous remarks allegedly uttered by him.

In his defence, the convict denied the charges, saying, “I am a Muslim by faith and ready to take oath on Kalma.” He said his former wife, in connivance with the complainant, hatched a conspiracy to usurp his properties worth millions of rupees by implicating him in a fake case.

The defence counsel also challenged the prosecution’s story, saying the FIR was lodged with an unexplained delay and the accused was set up in a trap.

He argued that no forensic analysis was conducted of the mobile phone used to record the alleged objectionable remarks by the accused.

In his verdict, Additional District & Sessions Judge Syed Shahzad Muzaffar Hamdani noted that the FIA cybercrime wing conducted a forensic analysis of the voice of the accused saved in a USB device and the result was positive.

The judge observed that no probability of false implication or manipulation for any other reason could be detected and consequently, the intrinsic worth of the accused person’s former wife’s testimony was impeccable and unquestionable.

Rejecting the defence taken by the accused, the judge said the faith of the accused was not under consideration before the court as his alleged act of blasphemy had to be scanned.

He said the accused also failed to produce any document of his property due to which he was falsely trapped by the complainant.

The judge maintained that the defence plea and documents tendered in defence evidence appeared elusive and inconclusive, respectively, which neither served any purpose in favour of the accused nor adversely impacted the prosecution version.

“I feel no hesitation to infer that prosecution successfully proved the case/charge against the accused beyond a shadow of doubt and he (the accused) passed the blasphemous/profane remarks in respect of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and Islamic principles,” AD&SJ Hamdani observed in the judgment.

The judge noted that the accused is a middle-aged person with mature thinking and not mentally or physically ill, nor his counsel agitated any such fact at any stage.

The judge handed down a death sentence to the accused under section 295 C, along with a fine of Rs500,000.

Published in Dawn, February 28th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Unquiet Lebanon
Updated 21 Jun, 2026

Unquiet Lebanon

Either Israel must silence its guns and withdraw from all of Lebanon, or face isolation and boycott from the international community.
Mothers at risk
21 Jun, 2026

Mothers at risk

FOR years, efforts to reduce maternal deaths have focused heavily on postpartum haemorrhage — the severe bleeding...
Political budget
21 Jun, 2026

Political budget

THE KP budget does not read like a document of a province getting its fiscal house in order. Revenue is projected at...
Pakistan’s moment
Updated 20 Jun, 2026

Pakistan’s moment

Pakistan’s diplomats are second to none, and if these states seek to engage this country constructively, a new modus vivendi for the subcontinent can be reached.
Menacing water plans
20 Jun, 2026

Menacing water plans

IN April last year, India suspended the decades-old Indus Waters Treaty, which contains no provision allowing it to...
World Refugee Day
20 Jun, 2026

World Refugee Day

WORLD Refugee Day, observed today around the globe, marks 75 years since the adoption of the 1951 convention ...