Lahore man gets death penalty, fine in blasphemy case

Published
0

LAHORE: A sessions court has awarded the death penalty to a man for committing blasphemy on Thursday.

Shahdara police had registered the FIR in 2020 under section 295 A & C of the PPC on the complaint of Niaz Ahmad Noori, a prayer leader and local emir of Tehreek-i-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP).

The complainant alleged that the accused uttered disrespectful remarks against the Holy Prophet (PBUH).

The former wife of the convict also testified in the trial proceedings and presented an audio recording of the blasphemous remarks allegedly uttered by him.

In his defence, the convict denied the charges, saying, “I am a Muslim by faith and ready to take oath on Kalma.” He said his former wife, in connivance with the complainant, hatched a conspiracy to usurp his properties worth millions of rupees by implicating him in a fake case.

The defence counsel also challenged the prosecution’s story, saying the FIR was lodged with an unexplained delay and the accused was set up in a trap.

He argued that no forensic analysis was conducted of the mobile phone used to record the alleged objectionable remarks by the accused.

In his verdict, Additional District & Sessions Judge Syed Shahzad Muzaffar Hamdani noted that the FIA cybercrime wing conducted a forensic analysis of the voice of the accused saved in a USB device and the result was positive.

The judge observed that no probability of false implication or manipulation for any other reason could be detected and consequently, the intrinsic worth of the accused person’s former wife’s testimony was impeccable and unquestionable.

Rejecting the defence taken by the accused, the judge said the faith of the accused was not under consideration before the court as his alleged act of blasphemy had to be scanned.

He said the accused also failed to produce any document of his property due to which he was falsely trapped by the complainant.

The judge maintained that the defence plea and documents tendered in defence evidence appeared elusive and inconclusive, respectively, which neither served any purpose in favour of the accused nor adversely impacted the prosecution version.

“I feel no hesitation to infer that prosecution successfully proved the case/charge against the accused beyond a shadow of doubt and he (the accused) passed the blasphemous/profane remarks in respect of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and Islamic principles,” AD&SJ Hamdani observed in the judgment.

The judge noted that the accused is a middle-aged person with mature thinking and not mentally or physically ill, nor his counsel agitated any such fact at any stage.

The judge handed down a death sentence to the accused under section 295 C, along with a fine of Rs500,000.

Published in Dawn, February 28th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

State of confusion
Updated 05 Aug, 2026

State of confusion

FROM the looks of it, America has no exit strategy to extricate itself from the disastrous war with Iran. US...
Pension decision
05 Aug, 2026

Pension decision

THE government’s decision to formally operationalise the new Defined Contribution Pension Fund Scheme is a step...
Preventable deaths
05 Aug, 2026

Preventable deaths

THE deaths of 144 children from measles and diphtheria in Karachi during the first seven months of the year expose a...
Swat bombing
Updated 04 Aug, 2026

Swat bombing

IT is a bitter irony that terrorists struck a protest against violence in Swat on Sunday, causing at least 17...
Tariff blow
04 Aug, 2026

Tariff blow

FOR an export sector already squeezed by high production costs, the additional 10pc tariff on top of the existing...
Perilous peaks
04 Aug, 2026

Perilous peaks

THE deaths of 10 climbers in an avalanche on Broad Peak is a sad reminder of the perils that many mountaineers face...