LONDON: Humanitarian charities said they were “stunned” and “appalled” by Britain’s decision to cut its international aid budget to boost defence spending, warning it would damage UK influence and have a devastating impact on those they support.

David Miliband, a former foreign secretary from the governing Labour Party and now head of the International Rescue Committee charity, said the move was “a blow to Britain’s proud reputation as a global humanitarian and development leader”.

Britain is the fifth largest international aid donor, giving over 19 billion dollars in 2023, according to data from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). The United States tops the ranking, followed by Germany, European Union institutions and Japan.

This week Starmer will meet US President Donald Trump, whose adviser Elon Musk has boasted of gutting Washington’s own foreign aid agency by “feeding USAID into the wood chipper”. “To appease Trump, he will cut aid to its lowest level in a generation,” said Nick Dearden, director of campaign group Global Justice Now. “It is a day of shame for Britain.”

United Nations children’s agency Unicef said the British aid cut would “undoubtedly risk lives”. Oxfam accused Starmer of “bending to populist pressures”.

Changing course

Britain used to devote 0.7pc of its gross national income to overseas development before it was cut by the previous Conservative government to 0.5pc in 2020 due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Starmer’s government had pledged to restore the aid budget back to 0.7pc before it sharply changed course.

“This is a short-sighted and appalling move,” said Romilly Greenhill, CEO of London-based Bond, a network for humanitarian organisations. “Slashing the already diminished UK aid budget to fund an uplift in defence is a reckless decision.”

ActionAid described it as a political choice that could have devastating consequences for people affected by humanitarian crisis, such as in Gaza, the Democratic Republic of Congo and even Ukraine. But Starmer’s announcement on aid was met with little immediate political criticism in the House of Commons.

Sarah Champion, Labour lawmaker and chair of the International Development Select Committee, was a rare voice opposing the move, saying aid spending could prevent wars. “Aid vs defence isn’t a realistic narrative for keeping the world safe,” she said.

Published in Dawn, February 26th, 2025

Opinion

Trouble at home

Trouble at home

The country’s strength lies in its political and economic stability, not in fleeting moments of diplomatic success.

Editorial

Pezeshkian’s visit
Updated 24 Jun, 2026

Pezeshkian’s visit

Perhaps a good place to start would be the resumption of work on the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline.
Telecom bill
24 Jun, 2026

Telecom bill

THERE is now no question about it: the Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-organisation) (Amendment) Bill of 2026 is a...
Updating Islamabad
24 Jun, 2026

Updating Islamabad

ISLAMABAD is growing rapidly. Its planning, however, remains stuck in bureaucratic limbo. Despite years of ...
Unsustainable growth
Updated 23 Jun, 2026

Unsustainable growth

CLICHÉS are an essential part of political rhetoric. But when repeated often, they lose their impact. So when...
Banned speeches
23 Jun, 2026

Banned speeches

NATIONAL Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq on Sunday formally lifted long-standing restrictions on the airing of ...
New GB government
23 Jun, 2026

New GB government

WITH the newly elected lawmakers of the Gilgit-Baltistan Assembly taking oath on Monday, the PPP looks set to head...