Justice Sardar Muham­mad Sarfraz Dogar on Thursday was notified as the acting chief justice of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) amid reservations expressed by some judges over his seniority.

Judges recently elevated to the Supreme Court will also be sworn in by the chief justice of Pakistan (CJP) today.

Unlike the usual practice, where a senior judge administers the oath to an acting chief justice of a high court, President Asif Ali Zardari will oversee Justice Dogar’s oath-taking. This follows speculation that five senior IHC judges, who had openly opposed Justice Dogar’s transfer, might refuse to administer the oath.

According to a notification issued by the Ministry of Law and Justice, a copy of which is available with Dawn.com, Dogar was appointed acting chief justice by the president.

He will step into the position “with effect from the date he [takes] oath of his office, till appointment of regular chief justice.”

Dogar was moved to courtroom number one and has begun hearing cases.

His appointment as acting chief justice follows the appointment of Justice Aamer Farooq to the SC earlier this week.

Late on Wednesday night, the Ministry of Law and Justice issued a notification formally announcing Justice Dogar’s appointment as acting chief justice of the IHC. The appointment, made by the president under Article 196, may diminish the controversy over seniority.

The law ministry also notified acting chief justices of the three other high courts: Justice Ejaz Swati has been appointed as acting CJ of Balochistan High Court (BHC), Justice Junaid Ghaffar has been named acting CJ of Sindh High Court (SHC) and Justice S.M. Attique Shah as acting CJ Peshawar High Court (PHC).

In addition, notifications for the appointment of seven judges to the Supreme Court have also been issued.

Besides Justice Aamer Farooq, BHC Chief Justice Muhammad Has­him Khan Kakar, SHC Chief Justice Muhammad Shafi Sid­d­iqui and his colleague Justice Salah­ud­d­in Panhwar, PHC Chief Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim and his colleague Justice Shakeel Ahmad, and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb will be sworn in by the chief justice of Pakistan.

Justice Aurangzeb will serve as an acting Supreme Court judge under Article 181 of the Constitution to clear pending tax and commercial cases. The provision allows the president to appoint a high court judge to temporarily act as a Supreme Court judge.

Justice Aurangzeb will remain a judge of the SC until the pleasure of the president, after which the judge may either return to the IHC or be confirmed as a Supreme Court judge, depending on the situation.

Seniority concerns

Earlier, Justice Farooq cleared the way for Justice Dogar’s next move towards the office of the IHC chief justice by dismissing a representation filed by five IHC judges.

The representation had challenged the transfers of Justice Dogar (from LHC), Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro (from SHC), and Justice Mohammad Asif (from BHC), arguing that the move had unfairly affected their seniority.

The rejected representation was filed by Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Justice Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri, Justice Babar Sattar, Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan and Justice Saman Rafat.

The judges contended that under the Constitution, a high court judge must take a new oath upon transfer to a different high court, which should affect their seniority ranking.

The IHC chief justice responded to the representation with a detailed ruling. His judgement referenced several key legal principles, particularly constitutional articles concerning the transfer of judges and the distinction between transfers and fresh appointments.

He cited Article 200 of the Constitution, which allows the president of Pakistan to transfer a judge from one high court to another, provided the transfer is made with the consent of the judge and after consultation with the chief justice of Pakistan and the chief justices of the involved high courts.

The chief justice emphasised that while the transfer is constitutionally valid, it does not imply a fresh appointment or a change in the seniority of the judge in the receiving court.

The ruling noted that the Constitution does not require a judge to take a new oath upon transfer from one high court to another. Once a judge has taken the oath of office in their original high court, that oath continues to apply upon transfer.

Therefore, the seniority that the judge held in their previous high court should carry over to the new high court without resetting their position in the seniority list.

Interestingly, four SC judges — Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Munib Akhtar, Justice Ayesha Malik and Justice Athar Minallah — also expressed similar reservations in a letter written to Chief Justice of Pakistan Yahya Afridi.

The four judges described the transfer of judges as “suspect” in the absence of an oath-taking ceremony.

Opinion

Editorial

Token austerity
Updated 11 Mar, 2026

Token austerity

The ‘austerity’ measures are a ritualistic response to public anger rather than a sincere attempt to reform state spending.
Lebanon on fire
11 Mar, 2026

Lebanon on fire

WHILE the entire Gulf region has become an active warzone, repercussions of this conflict have spread to the...
Canine crisis
11 Mar, 2026

Canine crisis

KARACHI’S stray dog crisis requires urgent attention. Feral canines can cause serious and lasting physical and...
Iran’s new leader
Updated 10 Mar, 2026

Iran’s new leader

The position is the most powerful in Iran, bringing together clerical authority and political and ideological leadership.
National priorities
10 Mar, 2026

National priorities

EVEN as the country faces heightened risks of attacks from actual terrorists, an anti-terrorism court in Rawalpindi...
Silenced march
10 Mar, 2026

Silenced march

ON the eve of International Women’s Day, Islamabad Police detained dozens of Aurat March activists who had ...