LAHORE, April 21: Justice Mian Hamid Farooq of the Lahore High Court on Friday restrained Chaudhry Akhtar Rasool from working as an adviser to the Punjab government.

The court directed the provincial chief secretary to withdraw all perks and other fringe benefits attached to his office and submit a report. The court adjourned till May 4 further hearing of the constitutional writ petition, filed by local prayer leader Maulana Malik Shah Muhammad, who had primarily challenged Mian Muhammad Munir’s appointment as an adviser.

The judge also asked jurists S.M. Zafar, Abid Hassan Minto, Aitzaz Ahsan, Hamid Khan and Dr Khalid Ranjha to assist court as amicus curie on the next date of the hearing in determining the constitutional position of the appointment of advisers in the province.

The court issued fresh notices to the 23 other advisers, who have so far failed to appear in person or even through counsel with a reply to its earlier show-cause notice seeking their explanations as to under which legal authority they were occupying their office.

The court had issued notices to all 19 advisers to the provincial government and six to the chief minister about 10 days ago.

The petitioner brought their appointment into question with the contention that article 93 of the 1973 Constitution provided that only the president was competent to appoint five advisers in consultation with the prime minister to help him discharge his official duties. The constitution did not envisage the appointment of advisers to a provincial government or the chief minister.

The court, subsequently, restrained Mian Munir from working as an adviser and directed the chief secretary about 10 days ago that financial and administrative benefits attached to his office should be withdrawn.

As such, Akhtar Rasool is the second adviser who has been stopped from working. Both the advisers are among the six, who were convicted of contempt of court by the Supreme Court along with former MNA Tariq Aziz. They were charged with bringing the apex court into disrepute by storming into the courtroom at a time when it was in session.

The petitioner had raised the question of the conviction of Mian Munir and Akhtar Rasool by the apex court and contended that a convict could not be appointed to a public office as enshrined in article 63 of the constitution.

Only Mian Munir and Akhtar Rasool have so far been represented in court through their counsel Shehram Sarwar Chaudhry and Rashideen Kasuri, respectively, and no other adviser responded to the court notice issued about two weeks ago.

Opinion

Editorial

A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...
GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...