Law allowing phone tapping ambiguous, says Justice Mandokhail

Published
0

Supreme Court’s Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail termed the existing law allowing phone tapping “ambiguous” as the court’s constitutional bench heard a case related to the issue on Wednesday.

In July, the Ministry of Information Technology and Telecommunication authorised the country’s spy agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), to intercept and trace calls in the “interest of national security”.

The ministry’s notification said that the authorisation was granted to the ISI under Section 54 of the Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-organisation) Act, 1996. A day after, however, the government’s decision to allow phone tapping was challenged in the Lahore High Court (LHC).

Wednesday’s case was heard by a seven-member constitutional bench headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan.

At the outset of the hearing, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar inquired whether any legislation was made regarding the practice of phone tapping.

Additional Attorney General Aamir Rehman replied saying the law has been in place since 2013.

“According to the law, ISI and IB are notified. The procedure for phone tapping is in the law, and judicial supervision is also in the law,” he said.

Justice Mazhar replied, “According to the law, only a judge can give permission for phone tapping. Has any judge been notified for this purpose? The law does not allow everyone to tap every phone.”

Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail remarked that the phone-tapping law was “ambiguous.”

“The phone tapping case will also have an impact on pending cases,” he said. “This matter started from the chief justice’s chamber, where will the chief justice go?”

Justice Aminuddin Khan chimed in to say, “We are not interested in reports or the law, we want results.”

The additional attorney general said he was not aware of the nomination of a judge.

The advocate on record noted that contact has not been made with the petitioner, Major Shabbir, adding that his lawyer also passed away last year.

The court issued a notice to the advocate general and dismissed the hearing.

Last December, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) was informed during the hearing of a case related to audio leaks that the government had not permitted any intelligence agency to tap audio conversations.

Attorney General for Pakistan (AGP) Mansoor Usman Awan had informed the high court during the hearing of a petition filed by ex-premier Imran Khan’s spouse Bushra Bibi, who was seeking action against a leaked conversation, allegedly featuring her and PTI leader Latif Khosa.

Opinion

Editorial

Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...
Terror and politics
Updated 29 Sep, 2026

Terror and politics

There is an urgent need to tone down the rhetoric and tackle terrorism as a collective challenge for both the affected provinces and the federation.
Watching the glaciers
29 Sep, 2026

Watching the glaciers

THE latest signs from Pakistan’s mountains are worrying. Suparco says the number of unfrozen glacial lakes it...
Dangerous agenda
29 Sep, 2026

Dangerous agenda

AS the world remains fixated on the US-Iran conflict, elsewhere in the Middle East, Israel is consolidating its grip...