SC declares PPP man winner, rejects tribunal’s verdict

Published
PPP’s Mir Ubaidullah Gorgage. — Balochistan Assembly website/File
PPP’s Mir Ubaidullah Gorgage. — Balochistan Assembly website/File

QUETTA: A three-member bench of the Supreme Court on Wednesday restored Haji Mir Obaidullah Gorgage of Pakistan Peoples’ Party as member of the Balochistan Assembly and rejected the verdict of the Balochistan High Court’s election tribunal.

The Supreme Court bench comprised Justice Shahid Waheed, Justice Irfan Sadat Khan and Jus­tice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi.

Mr Gorgage contested election from PB-44, Quetta, in the general elections in February 2024 as a PPP candidate and he was elected the MPA. However, his rival candidate, the National Party’s Atta Muhammad Bangulzai, had challenged Mr Gorgage’s victory in the election tribunal of the Balochistan High Court which, after hearing the petition of Mr Bangulzai, accepted Mr Bangulzai’s petition and de-seated Mr Gorgage.

Mr Gorgage filed a petition in the Supreme Court against the verdict of the election tribunal.

The three-member bench of the Supreme Court, after hearing the petition of Mr Gorgage, rejected the verdict of the BHC tribunal and restored Mr Gorgage as the member of the Balochistan Assembly.

Advocate Khawaja Haris and Advocate Amanullah Kanrani appeared in the court on behalf of Mr Gorgage while Mr Bangulzai was represented by Advocate Masood Ali Khan.

The same bench of the Supreme Court also rejected the petition of Hammal Khan Baloch who had filed against the election tribunal’s decision that retained the victory of PPP’s Asghar Rind.

The Supreme Court bench, after hearing Mr Baloch’s plea, rejected his petition and stayed the verdict of the election tribunal in favour of Mr Rind.

Advocate Kamran Murtaza and Amanullah Kanrani appeared for Mr Rind while advocate Masood Ali Khan represented the petitioner.

Stay order vacated

The same Supreme Court bench vacated the stay order granted to Mir Ali Madad Jattak of PPP against the decision of the election tribunal and retained the decision of the poll tribunal regarding re-polling in 15 polling stations of PB-45, Quetta.

The apex court rejected the petition of Mr Jattak and ordered re-polling in 15 polling stations.

Published in Dawn, November 21st, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Quid pro quo
Updated 26 Jul, 2026

Quid pro quo

Accepting Israel would mean legitimising its violence against the Palestinians, as well as its neighbouring Arab states and Iran.
AI in government
26 Jul, 2026

AI in government

THE Prime Minister’s Office has announced the introduction of an AI-powered digital system and directed ministries...
Cautious optimism
26 Jul, 2026

Cautious optimism

THE latest polio surveillance figures offer some encouraging news regarding the difficult fight against polio. The...
Rampant lawlessness
Updated 25 Jul, 2026

Rampant lawlessness

THE brutal slaying of a judge and his guard in Mastung is the latest in a series of blood-drenched events that have...
Daily fuel pricing
25 Jul, 2026

Daily fuel pricing

THE government’s move to daily petroleum price adjustments should make fuel pricing more transparent and more...
The drug problem
25 Jul, 2026

The drug problem

WHILE Islamabad Police chase low-level peddlers, the capital’s kingpins have quietly taken their operations ...