Lawmakers blame Secret Service over Trump assassination bid

Published September 27, 2024
Former US President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump delivers remarks to the press at Trump Tower in New York City on September 26, 2024. — AFP File Photo
Former US President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump delivers remarks to the press at Trump Tower in New York City on September 26, 2024. — AFP File Photo

WASHINGTON: Lawmakers probing the Pennsylvania assassination attempt against Donald Trump blamed Secret Service failures during their first hearing on Thursday for a series of security lapses that allowed a gunman to open fire on the Republican presidential nominee.

The Secret Service initially blamed local law enforcement over the July 13 attack at Trump’s campaign event in Butler, which left one man dead and the ex-president nursing a bloodied ear where a bullet grazed him. But members of a cross-party House task force set up to investigate the incident heard that the agency, which protects US political leaders, communicated poorly over securing the nearby building that gunman Thomas Michael Crooks scaled and took aim from.

Witnesses from several law enforcement agencies described chaotic and piecemeal organisation in the hours before Trump took the stage, with no central command post in charge of messaging and instructions shared haphazardly. “In the days leading up to the rally, it was not a single mistake that allowed Crooks to outmaneuver one of our country’s most elite group of security professionals — there were security failures on multiple fronts,” said Republican co-chair Mike Kelly, whose hometown is Butler.

His Democratic counterpart Jason Crow praised local police but said communication between all the agencies involved had been “disjointed and unclear.” The panel was set up days after the shooting and has carried out two dozen interviews with local police, met with federal agents and received more than 2,800 pages of documents from the Secret Service.

Published in Dawn, September 27th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Sustainable path?
Updated 13 Jun, 2026

Sustainable path?

The FY27 budget is the first clear signal that the government is ready to transition from stabilisation to growth.
Prioritising education
13 Jun, 2026

Prioritising education

THOUGH the improvement in the country’s literacy rate may be slight, as highlighted by the Economic Survey, it ...
Poverty’s rise
13 Jun, 2026

Poverty’s rise

AS attention turns to the government’s plans for the coming fiscal year, one set of figures deserves particular...
A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...