THIS is with reference to the news report ‘Pakistan incensed by US resolution seeking poll probe’ (June 27) which talked about Pakistan’s reaction to the House of Representatives resolution HR 901. While expressing support for democracy and human rights is, indeed, commendable in principle, it does bring to light the historical double standards that have been an integral part of American foreign policy.

The US commitment to promoting democratic values globally often seems selective, especially when juxtaposed against its historical support for various dictatorships and authoritarian regimes worldwide, including Pakistan. This pattern of supporting non-democratic governments has been evident from Latin America to the Middle East. The dichotomy between the ‘cherished’ values expressed by Washington and its actions often undermines the credibility of its stance on democracy and human rights.

For decades, the US has backed regimes that align with its strategic interests, regardless of their democratic credentials. This selective promotion of democracy often raises questions about the genuine intentions behind such resolutions.

In Pakistan’s context, resolution HR 901 rightly emphasises the need for free and fair elections and condemns human rights abuses. However, it is equally crucial to acknowledge that Pakistan’s political landscape has been significantly and often influenced by external interventions, including those from the US. Encouraging democratic practices and human rights in Pakistan requires a consistent and genuine approach, free from the shadow of geopolitical interests.

If the US government truly wishes to support democracy globally, it must adopt a consistent policy that upholds democratic values universally, not just where it serves its own vested interests. Only then can such resolutions have a chance to carry the weight they intend to, and foster genuine democratic progress.

Maj (retd) Dr Usman Farooq
Karachi

Published in Dawn, June 30th, 2024