Journalists assail Pemra ban on court reporting

Published
0

• Pleas in IHC, LHC say directive is ‘against media freedom’
• New order restrains media from airing material that may constitute contempt

ISLAMABAD/LAHORE: In resp­o­nse to a directive issued by Pemra banning the live coverage of court proceedings on news channels, multiple petitions assailing the order have been submitted to the high courts of Lahore and Islamabad.

In the Islamabad High Court, press associations of the Supreme Court and the IHC filed a joint petition on Thursday, which directed “all satellite news channel licensees that no content, including commentary, opinions, or suggestions about the potential fate of such sub-judice matter which tends to prejudice the determination by a court shall be aired”.

Pemra also restricted television channels from airing tickers/headlines with regard to court proceedings, saying they shall only report the written orders. However, the channels are allowed to report court proceedings which are broadcast live. It also warned of legal action in case of any violation by the TV channels.

The petition filed before the IHC said: “By imposing a blackout on court proceedings without even consulting the judiciary, Pemra is effectively committing an assault on the independence of the judiciary, in addition to violating the public’s right of access to information, journalists’ freedom of speech and litigants’ right to a fair trial.”

On the other hand, Justice Abid Aziz Sheikh of the Lahore High Court will hear today (Friday) two petitions challenging the Pemra order that restricted the coverage of court proceedings on news channels to written orders.

Advocate Samra Malik and another person filed the petitions pleading with the Pemra not to issue an ‘unconstitutional notification’, which violates the fundamental rights of the citizens and the media as well.

The petitioners claimed that the Pemra had been acting under political pressure of the government, which was already hostile to media’s rights as guaranteed under articles 19 & 19A of the Constitution.

They said Pemra committed gross illegality by not investigating and thoroughly examining the issue in accordance with the touchstone of the relevant laws.

Contemptuous material

Separately, the Press Information Department on Thursday warned media houses against carrying any material “constituting contempt of court”.

Referring to a Supreme Court order issued on May 17, the government said that all those who broadcast, re-broadcast and/or publish material constituting contempt of court may also be committing contempt, therefore, they shou­ld desist from doing so, failing which they may also be proceeded against for contempt of court.

Published in Dawn, May 24th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Muddled hierarchy
Updated 15 Nov, 2026

Muddled hierarchy

The jurisdiction of the two courts and a mechanism for settling disputes between them should be spelt out in law, not left to judges to fight over.
Growing crisis
15 Nov, 2026

Growing crisis

AN emergency can be judged by the speed with which it draws an effective response. The National Population Council’s...
Organised rackets
15 Nov, 2026

Organised rackets

ON the International Day against Transnational Organised Crime, observed today, Pakistan finds itself in a tight...
Referendum talk
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Referendum talk

Unless the PPP is deliberately using Sindh as a bargaining chip, it should issue a clarification with a clear, consistent position on new administrative units, not one tailored to protect its home turf.
Mineral wealth
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Mineral wealth

Minerals should not be presented as a solution to Pakistan’s long-term economic difficulties. The aim should be to build an industrial base rather than export raw materials.
Late diagnosis
14 Nov, 2026

Late diagnosis

AS we mark World Diabetes Day today, Pakistan faces a troubling question: how many people are living with diabetes...