ISLAMABAD, March 16: The opposition senators on Thursday criticized the appointment of two retired judges in the Supreme Court on an ad hoc basis and accused the government of violating the apex court’s 1996 verdict in the judges case.

The issue came under discussion during the question hour when Minister for Law, Justice and Human Rights Wasi Zafar in a written reply to a question of MMA’s Ismail Buledi informed the upper house that at present 19 judges were working in the court against its sanctioned strength of 17. The minister said two retired judges — Hamid Ali Mirza and Karamat Nazir Bhandari — had been appointed as ad hoc judges for a period of one year up to September 13.

People’s Party Parliamentarians’ Senator Farooq Naek said the appointments on ad hoc basis were made when there were no suitable candidates available for a job. He questioned as to why two retired judges had been appointed when there were judges in high courts.

Minister of State for Law Shahid Akram Bhinder said the government had not violated the constitution by making ad hoc appointments.

PPP’s Senator Dr Safdar Abbasi alleged that the government had been violating the 1996 judgment in the judges case, which determined the principle of seniority for high courts and SC judges.

When the minister asked the PPP senator to mention where the violation had been made, Mr Abbasi said the chief justice of the Lahore High Court should have been elevated to the Supreme Court bench in the light of the judges case verdict.

Earlier, Raza Mohammad Raza of the Pakhtoonkhwa Milli Awami Party and Sanaullah Baloch of the Balochistan National Party regretted that out of the total confirmed SC judges, eight belonged to Punjab, while three judges each were from Sindh, NWFP and Balochistan. They said the appointment of judges should not be made on the basis of population.

Mr Baloch suggested that the house should recommend that judges in the SC should be appointed on equality basis as it would help remove the sense of deprivation among small provinces to some extent. He proposed that there should be four judges in the SC from each province, while one judge each should be appointed from the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata), Northern Areas and Islamabad capital territory.

Opinion

Editorial

Sustainable path?
Updated 13 Jun, 2026

Sustainable path?

The FY27 budget is the first clear signal that the government is ready to transition from stabilisation to growth.
Prioritising education
13 Jun, 2026

Prioritising education

THOUGH the improvement in the country’s literacy rate may be slight, as highlighted by the Economic Survey, it ...
Poverty’s rise
13 Jun, 2026

Poverty’s rise

AS attention turns to the government’s plans for the coming fiscal year, one set of figures deserves particular...
A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...