KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Wednesday issued notices to the ministry of interior and the federal law officer on a petition seeking safety and security of former prime minister Imran Khan in the Adiala Jail.

The two-judge headed by Chief Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi directed the respondent as well as a federal law officer to file reply/comments till April 2.

Petitioner Abdul Wahab Baloch submitted that he was the president of Insaf Lawyers Forum of Sindh, the legal wing of Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf.

He said that the party’s founder was implicated in politically motivated cases and currently incarcerated in Central Prison Rawalpindi (Adiala Jail).

Citing the federation through the ministry of interior as respondent, he contended that a ban had been imposed by the jail authorities on meetings with the former prime minister on the pretext that he had serious life threats and some terrorists had been arrested around/near the detention facility with explosive material.

The petitioner also argued that under the constitution, the federation was responsible for ensuring safety and security of all individuals/citizens of Pakistan, including the detained founder of PTI.

He further maintained that the current environment and prevailing circumstances raised serious concerns about the safety of Mr Khan while in the past some political leaders and high-profile figures had been subjected to harm, including two former prime ministers Liaquat Ali Khan and Benazir Bhutto.

The petitioner said that despite such security concerns, the interior ministry was negligent towards the performance of its constitutionally bound duty to take extraordinary measures to ensure safety of the former prime minister.

He asked the SHC to issue directive to the respondent to ensure safety and security of Mr Khan in the Adiala Jail.

During the preliminary hearing, the bench questioned the maintainability of the petition and asked the lawyer for petitioner as to why the Lahore High Court Rawalpindi bench had not been approached in this regard.

The counsel submitted that they were not seeking directive for Punjab government but for federation to ensure safety of the former prime minister.

The bench issued pre-admission notices to the ministry of interior as well as a federal law officer for next hearing.

Published in Dawn, March 21st, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Shifting climate tone
Updated 08 May, 2026

Shifting climate tone

Our financial system is geared towards short-term, risk-averse lending, while climate adaptation and green infrastructure require patient, long-term capital.
Honour and impunity
08 May, 2026

Honour and impunity

THE Sindh Assembly’s discussion on karo-kari this week reminds us of the enduring nature of ‘honour’ killings...
No real change
08 May, 2026

No real change

THE Indian sports ministry’s move to allow Pakistani players and teams to participate in multilateral events ...
A breakthrough?
07 May, 2026

A breakthrough?

The whole world would welcome an end to this pointless war.
Missed opportunity
07 May, 2026

Missed opportunity

A BIG opportunity to industrialise Pakistan has just passed us by. This has been reconfirmed by the investment...
Punishing dissent
07 May, 2026

Punishing dissent

THE Sindh government’s treatment of the Aurat March this week was a disgraceful assault on democratic rights. What...