Crushing protests

Published March 12, 2024

PUNJAB has a new government, with a new chief minister at the helm. And yet, the same old tactics are being employed against the opposition PTI, with the provincial police’s heavy-handed dispersal of the party’s demonstrators. Sunday’s crackdown, according to party leader Omar Ayub, involved the beating and detention of what he said were 100 protesters. This aggression by the police, for months now, seems to be part of a broader strategy which the party claims is aimed at “crushing” it. Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz has been pinpointed by the party for this latest transgression, with her vows of “ruthlessness” against any “violence” by the opposition now manifesting in the said action. The use of serious charges, including terrorism clauses, in criminal complaints against PTI members further illustrates what seems to be a misuse of the legal system to intimidate the opposition. A particularly distressing video, showing stick-wielding policemen surrounding a vehicle with children seated in the back, has ignited condemnation, exposing the need for a recalibrated approach to law enforcement and addressing public frustrations.

It is crucial to recognise that protests indicate underlying grievances that require attention, not suppression. The widespread demonstrations across Punjab reflect deep-seated discontent that should prompt dialogue and reform, rather than punishment. The essence of democracy lies in the ability to express dissent and engage in peaceful assembly. Pakistan’s sociopolitical fabric is already delicate, with economic challenges and internal strife posing threats to its stability. The country cannot afford to exacerbate these issues through heavy-handed measures against its citizens. The Punjab government and, by extension, the national leadership, must acknowledge that stifling peaceful protests only deepens societal divides and fosters resentment. The authorities must reassess their approach to handling protests. On becoming chief minister, Ms Nawaz promised that she would be a representative of 120m people — across political divides. She should realise that those 120m also include the protesters.

Published in Dawn, March 12th, 2024

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...