A WIDELY circulated post on social media platform X gained traction on Monday with the insinuation that the PML-N shared a manipulated image from its Mansehra rally the same day to inflate the crowd size. The claim is false since the original image shared does not match the circulated image.

According to fact-checking platform iVerify Pakistan, the post was shared by an account under the name, picture and appearance of journalist Haroon Rasheed. The post did not mention the political party whose rally the image was from and neither did it mention the time, date, location, context or setting of the image.

However, the flags seen in the image, the symbol of a tiger on the flags and a stuffed toy of a white tiger all pointed it to being a PML-N rally.

The attached image was circled at three points to show a man wearing a purple shirt, with his arms crossed behind his head. The post gained over 184,000 views as of the time of writing and was shared by PTI’s economic affairs spokesperson Muzammil Aslam as well.

The iVerify platform traced the image to one shared by the PML-N Punjab chapter on its official X account on Monday at 6:12pm.

Comparing the circulated image and the one shared by the party showed that the man in the purple shirt was only present in the middle of the picture shared by the PML-N. He could not be detected at the other spots as circled in red in the circulated photograph.

Furthermore, the circulated picture was not shared by Rasheed’s official X account but a self-described “fan account”. The X handle for the fan account was spelt haroonn_natamam, while Rasheed’s official X handle is spelt haroon_natamam.

The fan account has an extra ‘n’ in its spelling of Haroon.

The platform concluded that the viral image from the PML-N Mansehra rally and the associated implication that the party shared a doctored photograph to inflate its attendance are false “as the original photo does not show the same purple-shirt man standing at three different places in the crowd”.

This fact check has been published in partnership with iVerify Pakistan — a project of CEJ and UNDP

Published in Dawn, January 24th, 2024

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...