THIS is with reference to the report “India’s top court upholds end of special status for held Kashmir, orders polls” (Dec 11), according to which a five-judge bench of the Indian Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice D.Y. Chand-rachud, ruled that Article 370 was an interim arrangement. The India-occupied Jammu and Kashmir was no different from other states in India, and the abrogation of Article 370 was an end of a 70-year exercise, the bench remarked.

The decision not only brings more pain and misery to the occupied valley’s predominantly Muslim population, but also exposes a glaring flaw in the judgement and ignorance of the United Nations Charter on the part of all the five judges on the bench. The UN Charter entails mandatory conditions for any country to lay claims related to territories, sovereignty and independence.

According to international lawyer Alexander Panin, to be recognised and accepted as an independent country, or a legitimate part of any state, it is mandatory that a country must complete the border demarcations with neighbouring countries, obtain their consent, document every detail and sign agreements with all such countries.

India has so far failed to obtain the consent of both Pakistan and China, the countries with which India shares its borders, and has territorial disputes. This is the reason that occupied Kashmir, and Aksai Chin, Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh do not exist as part of Indian territories on the official UN global maps.

It is here that the Indian Supreme Court and all the five judges on the bench stand totally exposed. It is absolutely wrong to consider occupied Jammu and Kashmir as “no different” from other states in the country. It is hoped that UN Secretary-General António Guterres and peace-loving countries of the world will take notice of this ‘done deal’ between the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government and the five-judge bench of the Indian Supreme Court.

The whole episode has also exposed the hypocrisy of the West, which has been supporting fascist states like India and Israel even though both of them happen to be involved in violating fundamental rights of the people they have been oppressing for the last several decades.

Abid Mahmud Ansari
Islamabad

Published in Dawn, December 24th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Agriculture concerns
24 Jun, 2025

Agriculture concerns

PRIME Minister Shehbaz Sharif appears relieved that the IMF did not turn down Pakistan’s request to exempt...
OIC reaction
Updated 24 Jun, 2025

OIC reaction

The bare minimum OIC can do is to take firm action against the butchery of Palestinian people and resist regime change.
NEVs, but for whom?
24 Jun, 2025

NEVs, but for whom?

THE government’s policy gymnastics following Pakistan’s unexpectedly rapid adoption of rooftop solar have ...
US aggression
Updated 23 Jun, 2025

US aggression

If there is any state in the world that the international community must be concerned about harbouring weapons of mass destruction, it is Israel.
Finishing the job
23 Jun, 2025

Finishing the job

THE federal health minister’s assertion of a 99pc reduction in polio cases in Pakistan, while impressive on the...
Exam leaks
23 Jun, 2025

Exam leaks

FOR students who put in countless hours of hard work for their secondary school exams — mainly to secure admission...