US SC declines to fast-track Trump’s immunity case

Published
0

WASHINGTON: The US Supreme Court has declined to immediately hear former president Donald Trump’s claim that he is immune from prosecution, potentially delaying his 2020 election interference trial.

Special Counsel Jack Smith had asked the nation’s highest court to take up the immunity case on an expedited basis, bypassing the federal court of appeals.

The Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, including three justices nominated by Trump, denied the request in a one-line order that did not provide any reason for the decision.

Trump, the frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination, is currently scheduled to go on trial on March 4, 2024 on charges of conspiring to overturn the 2020 election won by Biden.

Arguments before DC appeals court to begin on Jan 9

US District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is to preside over Trump’s March trial, rejected the immunity claim on Dec 1, saying an ex-president does not have a lifelong ‘get-out-of-jail-free’ pass.

Trump’s lawyers appealed her decision to the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit as Smith, the special counsel, asked the Supreme Court to hear the case.

Appeals court hearing

With the SC’s rejection of Smith’s request, the appeals court will now first hear the immunity case.

Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond, said this could make it difficult to maintain the March trial date. The Supreme Court had agreed to “fast-track” appeals in 19 cases over the past four years and it was unclear why the justices had declined to do so here, Tobias noted.

Trump welcomed the SC move and said he was looking forward to presenting his arguments before the appeals court. “Of course I am entitled to Presidential Immunity,” he said in a post on his Truth Social platform.

“I was President, it was my right and duty to investigate, and speak on, the rigged and stolen 2020 Presidential Election,” he said, repeating his baseless claims to have won the election.

The DC appeals court has scheduled arguments for January 9, 2024 and its ruling is expected to eventually reach the SC, whose current session ends in June.

Published in Dawn, December 24th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Restructuring plans
10 Nov, 2026

Restructuring plans

NO matter how strongly the PPP, a key coalition partner, wishes to see it buried, the push for new administrative...
Extreme heat
10 Nov, 2026

Extreme heat

CLIMATE change is already taking its toll on Pakistan’s farm sector. Crop yields are falling, livestock productivity...
Israel power struggle
10 Nov, 2026

Israel power struggle

A POWER struggle is emerging after last month’s elections in Israel resulted in no party securing the requisite...
Antalya agenda
Updated 09 Nov, 2026

Antalya agenda

For Pakistan, the priority should be to secure easier access to climate funds, more grants rather than debt-creating loans, and clear deadlines for financial contributions.
Beyond viewership
09 Nov, 2026

Beyond viewership

PAKISTAN has an enormous appetite for online content. According to the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority, it...
Rabid Modi
Updated 09 Nov, 2026

Rabid Modi

Modi’s silence throughout his reign of fear shows his endorsement of hate.