KARACHI: The provincial authorities informed the Sindh High Court that the process of recruitment had been suspended and no appointment was made in the light of an interim restraining order issued by the SHC in August.

The single-judge bench headed by Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput extended its earlier order restraining the defendants from processing the recruitment in over 140 departments, autonomous and other bodies of the Sindh government till Oct 16.

The Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan had filed a lawsuit in the SHC on Aug 8 contending that the then outgoing provincial government, its secretaries, departments, autonomous bodies, etc, had unleashed a mala fide and unlawful campaign to fill thousands of vacancies without observing formalities in order to carry out pre-poll rigging and dish out jobs to their favourites.

At the outset of the hearing on Tuesday, almost all defendant departments and autonomous bodies filed statements in the light of previous order and contended that the recruitment process had been suspended, the advertisements withdrawn and no appointment was made between June and August.

The secretary of services also filed a report of behalf of the chief secretary Sindh along with statements of departments concerned and submitted that in compliance with the Sept 19 order of the bench, the statements were called from the secretaries concerned and deputy commissioners, being head of selection committees, and they submitted that no appointment had been made in violation of interim restraining order issued on Aug 9.

The lawyer for plaintiffs, Dr Farogh Naseem, pointed out that another lawsuit on somehow same controversy was also pending adjudication before the SHC and asked the court to tag the same with the present proceedings for joint hearing.

The bench directed its office that both lawsuits were tagged and adjourned the hearing till Oct 16 and also ruled that interim order passed earlier will continue till next date of hearing.

Published in Dawn, October 5th, 2023

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...