PTI chief shifted to Adiala jail in Rawalpindi on court orders

Published September 26, 2023
PTI chief Imran Khan was moved to Adiala Jail amid tight security on Tuesday night. — DawnNewsTV
PTI chief Imran Khan was moved to Adiala Jail amid tight security on Tuesday night. — DawnNewsTV

PTI Chairman Imran Khan, who has been serving a three-year sentence in the Toshakhana case at the Attock Jail, was on Tuesday shifted to Rawalpindi’s Adiala jail on directives of the Islamabad High Court (IHC).

Adiala jail superintendent Asad Warraich confirmed to Dawn.com that the ex-premier had reached the prison. He said security surrounding the Adiala jail was tightened.

Waraich further stated that Imran would be provided facilities according to the jail manual.

Meanwhile, in a post on social media platform X, the PTI posted a video which showed party supporters showering rose petals on the police convoy transporting Imran near the Islamabad Toll Plaza.

The development comes a day after the IHC, while hearing petitions seeking Imran’s transfer to Rawalpindi, observed that under-trial prisoners (UTPs) of all the courts in the federal capital were kept at Adiala and issued directions to shift the PTI chief to that prison.

Earlier today, the court issued its written verdict on Imran’s plea seeking transfer to Rawalpindi’s Adiala Jail, ordering the same and setting aside all previous notifications and orders under which he was detained at the Attock jail.

The order, a copy of which is available with Dawn.com, stated that the current status of the petitioner was an under-trial prisoner. Noting that Islamabad did not have a prison of its own, it said that all such prisoners facing cases in the capital were to be kept at the Adiala Jail.

“To say that it (Adiala Jail) cannot house another prisoner/person, would not reflect the correct position,” the order stated.

It further said, “There is nothing on record to substantiate the plea of the respondents regarding security concerns or lack of adequate security at the Central Jail Adyala, Rawalpindi.”

On the matter of jail facilities provided to the former premier, it observed: “He (Imran) shall be entitled to all the facilities which are afforded to a better-class prisoner.”

Regarding the request made a day ago that the PTI chief be provided with an “exercise machine”, the IHC said it could not issue such directions and whether it was permissible or not, and directed Imran to file an application for it before the Attock jail superintendent.

Meanwhile, the IHC also issued the written verdict on Imran’s plea against the Federal Investigation Agency’s request for in-camera proceedings of the PTI chief’s bail plea before the high court.

In it, the IHC noted that the petitioner’s counsel had submitted that he had “no objection if unnecessary people are excluded” from the hearing.

Stating that Section 14 of the Offical Secrets Act 1923 permitted the “exclusion of public from the proceedings”, the IHC said it required that the prosecution file an application for it.

“In case, the prosecution is interested that the public be excluded from the proceedings of instant case, it may move an appropriate application in this behalf,” it observed.

Judicial remand of Imran, Qureshi extended in cipher case

Separately, a special court extended PTI Chairman Imran Khan’s and Vice Chairman Shah Mahmood Qureshi’s judicial remand in the cipher case until October 10.

The cipher case pertains to a diplomatic document which reportedly went missing from Imran’s possession. The PTI alleges that it contained a threat from the United States to oust Imran from power.

Following the suspension of the PTI chairman’s three-year jail term in the Toshakhana case, it emerged that he had been in judicial remand in the cipher case.

As per the law ministry’s notification, Imran’s special court proceedings are being held in the Attock jail “due to security reasons”.

Imran’s judicial remand was initially extended till September 13 and then again till September 26, along with Qureshi’s. Both leaders’ bail pleas were rejected by the special court earlier this month. Subsequently, Imran has approached the Islamabad High Court (IHC) seeking post-arrest bail.

 Former foreign minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi talks to the media at the Federal Judicial Complex in Islamabad on September 26. — Screengrab from video provided by author
Former foreign minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi talks to the media at the Federal Judicial Complex in Islamabad on September 26. — Screengrab from video provided by author

Today, Special Court Judge Abual Hasnat Zulqarnain presided over the in-camera hearing, which took place at Attock jail. Prior to the hearing, elaborate security arrangements were made outside the jail.

The law ministry had yesterday issued a no-objection certificate (NOC) for the hearing to be held at the Attock jail. A copy of the NOC was also sent to the jail superintendent.

During the hearing, the Federal Investigation Agency’s (FIA) team was present as well as Imran’s lawyers Salman Safdar and Umair Niazi. Naeem Haider Panjotha and Latif Khosa, who are also the PTI chief’s counsels, also reached the jail to attend the hearing.

Subsequently, the judicial remand of the ex-premier was extended till October 10. The court also ordered the FIA to submit a challan soon of the case.

Meanwhile, Qureshi was presented before the special court at the Federal Judicial Complex (FJC) in Islamabad, where his attendance was marked by court officials. He was brought to the court handcuffed.

The FIA’s team, special prosecutors and PTI lawyers appeared before the court. The court authorities then informed him that his judicial remand in the case was also extended till October 10.

Talking to reporters at the FJC, the former foreign minister said his “intention was clear” and that he was innocent in the case.

He further said that if the PTI was not allowed to contest the general elections, the polls would be “meaningless” and “worthless”.

Opinion

Editorial

Royal tantrum
Updated 20 Jul, 2024

Royal tantrum

The PML-N's confrontational stance and overt refusal to respect courts orders on arguably flimsy pretexts is a dangerous sign.
Bangladesh chaos
Updated 20 Jul, 2024

Bangladesh chaos

The unfortunate events playing out in Bangladesh should serve as a warning sign for other South Asian states.
Fitch’s estimate
20 Jul, 2024

Fitch’s estimate

FITCH seems to be more optimistic about Pakistan accelerating its economic growth rate to 3.2pc during this fiscal...
Misplaced priorities
Updated 19 Jul, 2024

Misplaced priorities

The government must call its APC at the earliest and invite all stakeholders to take part; this matter cannot be delayed further.
Oman terror attack
19 Jul, 2024

Oman terror attack

THE normally peaceful sultanate of Oman was shaken by sectarian terrorism on Monday when militants belonging to the...
Urban flooding
19 Jul, 2024

Urban flooding

THE provincial authorities have been taking precautionary measures, or so we have been told, to cope with emergency...