PPP MPA, 7 others indicted in Nazim Jokhio case

Published December 11, 2022
Police escort PPP MPA Jam Awais to a local court in Karachi on November 5, 2021. — Photo courtesy: Imtiaz Ali
Police escort PPP MPA Jam Awais to a local court in Karachi on November 5, 2021. — Photo courtesy: Imtiaz Ali

KARACHI: More than a year after the gruesome killing of young Nazim Jokhio, a sessions court on Saturday indicted a PPP lawmaker and seven others for his murder.

MPA Jam Awais and his servants and guards — Haider Ali, Meer Ali, Muhammad Mairaj, Mohammad Saleem Salar, Mohammad Doda Khan, Ahmed Khan Shoro and Mohammad Soomar — have been charged with torturing the 26-year-old Jokhio to death at Mr Awais’s farmhouse in a Malir locality in November last year.

Additional District and Sessions Judge (Malir) Faraz Ahmed Chandio read out the charges against them.

However, the accused pleaded not guilty and would contest the charges. Subsequently, the court summoned the prosecution witnesses with directions to appear before it on Dec 22 to record their evidence.

Initially, the MPA, along with his elder brother MNA Jam Karim Bijjar and 12 servants, was booked for allegedly torturing Mr Jokhio to death after he had resisted houbara bustard hunting and filmed the lawmakers’ Arab guests while hunting in Mr Jokhio’s village.

Primarily, the police had twice charge-sheeted both PPP lawmakers and others in interim and final charge sheets submitted before a judicial magistrate in Malir.

However, on Feb 8, the magistrate returned the charge sheet and other case papers to the investigating officer with directions to file it before an antiterrorism court (ATC) as he said that the case fell within the ambit of the Antiterrorism Act, 1997.

Therefore, the final charge sheet and case file remained at the office of Sindh’s prosecutor general for around two months on the pretext of detained scrutiny.

In April, the investigating officer filed the charge sheet before the ATC, deleting sections 365 (kidnapping) and 109 (abetment) of the Pakistan Penal Code and excluding the names of both lawmakers and others from the list of the accused reportedly because the legal heirs had entered into a compromise with the main accused persons, which has yet to be declared valid by the court.

In May, the ATC transferred the case back to a regular court and observed that the case could not fall within the ambit of the ATA as defined by the Supreme Court in 2020 in the Ghulam Hussain versus the state case.

In July, a judicial magistrate discharged PPP lawmaker Mr Karim, and Jamal Ahmed, Abdul Razaque, Muhammad Khan, Mohammad Ishaque and Atta Mohammad from the case over insufficient evidence.

However, the magistrate also said the MPA and his seven servants would stand trial as he had ruled that “grounds exist to believe that offence is committed. Therefore, cognisance is taken on the report for the offences under sections 302 (premeditated murder), 201 (causing disappearance of evidence of the offence, or giving false information to screen offender), 365 (kidnapping), 506 (criminal intimidation), 109 (abetment) and 34 (common intention) of the Pakistan Penal Code”.

The magistrate had also noted that the MPA was removed from the list of the accused based on affidavits given by the complainant/brother of the victim and the deceased’s widow and on their further statements, forgiving the accused in the name of Allah Almighty.

However, he had ruled that since the accused had been let off on the basis of a compromise, which was not the domain of the investigating officer but rather an authority of the trial court to effect a compromise or otherwise; therefore, he did not agree with the report of the investigating officer and the accused persons, who have been let off by the investigating officer despite their nomination in the FIR, would join as accused in the crime and would stand trial before the court.

Published in Dawn, December 11th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.