PTI leader ‘tasked with engaging top general’ denounces Imran’s claims

Published November 11, 2022
A file photo of Khurram Hameed Khan Rokhri. — Khurram Hameed/Facebook
A file photo of Khurram Hameed Khan Rokhri. — Khurram Hameed/Facebook

KARACHI: Estranged PTI leader Major (retired) Khurram Hameed Khan Rokhri revealed on Thursday the timeline of “backchannel talks” between the PTI and the establishment, as he denounced former premier Imran Khan’s allegations against senior intelligence official Maj Gen Faisal Naseer.

In an interview with Hamid Mir on Geo News, Rokhri said that Gen Naseer was a “principled” and “professional man” who would never “trade his dignity to please someone”.

Rokhri, who is an ex-military man himself, is said to be among Imran’s close aides and holds a major position in PTI’s North Punjab chapter. Earlier this week, the PTI’s senior leadership issued a show-cause notice to him for allegedly speaking in favour of Gen Naseer on a television programme.

In Thursday’s interview, Mr Rokhri recalled that a few days after Shahbaz Gill was arrested, a meeting was held in Bani Gala where it was discussed that a new officer had been posted in Islamabad with the aim to “eliminate PTI and Imran Khan’s narrative”.

Retired Maj Khurram Rokhri reveals he met Gen Naseer a number of times to convey chairman’s messages; claims Khan being misled by people around him

“When Gen Faisal Naseer’s name was taken, I said hold on a minute. Now I know Gen Naseer the same way you know other people in Geo News or anyone in the media” he told Mr Mir.

“[PTI leader] Salman Ahmed asked me then what was the narrative… the next day they were going for a rally in Jhelum and I told Salman to tell Mr Khan this… I will cut things short here.”

“So Salman tells Mr Khan that the opinion of a close aide of yours [...] about Gen Faisal Naseer [...] is not the same as what people around you have. When Mr Khan asked him who was that person, Salman replied it is Maj Khurram,” he said.

Subsequently, Mr Rokhri went on, Mr Khan “told Salman to ask me to confront Gen Naseer”.

“I called Gen Naseer and told him I wanted to meet him. When I met him, I asked the general if he had been posted for this reason,” he stated. Gen Naseer told him that he was posted the day Gen Sarfaraz was martyred, some 20 days back, he said.

“I am a professional man… why would I want to do this… Imran Khan is the leader of the biggest political party of Pakistan… he is a hero of the country… why would I want this. And if someone is telling Imran this, please go and tell him that there is nothing as such,” Mr Rokhri quoted the general as saying.

Mr Rokhri then said that he asked the officer to meet the PTI leadership. “To this, he said that he was sitting on a constitutional seat and meeting political leadership was his job.”

The estranged PTI leader claimed that he conveyed this conversation to the party leadership after which he was instructed to “bridge the gap” and hold another meeting with Gen Naseer.

Mr Rokhri also claimed that in the second meeting, the intelligence officer said that the institution valued the people and the leader they elected. “Gen Naseer assured me that there would be no roadblocks from his side and requested to not defame the military leadership on the stage.”

A third meeting was held as well, where the former major was accompanied by Salman Ahmed as Imran Khan’s spokesperson, he continued, adding that both he and Salman wanted to “reduce friction” between the party and the establishment.

“We wanted to go towards elections so that Imran wins by a two-thirds majority. Imran Khan’s real power is the vote,” Mr Rokhri pressed, revealing that suspended party leader Faisal Vawda was trying to do the same thing.

Mr Rokhri further revealed that after the third meeting, it was decided that talks would be taken forward and a meeting should be held between Imran and “those he is naming today”.

“I received a message from the personages, those who have been accused, that we will hold a meeting. They said that they didn’t want Imran to come or that such things go in public… they said they trusted me and asked me to keep the points [for negotiation] in front of them.”

After this, Mr Rokhri said he was called to Mr Khan’s residence in Islamabad twice, but due to “other meetings” the PTI chief couldn’t meet him. “When they called me the third time, I refused.”

At one point during the interview, the retired major also said that Mr Khan was being “misled” by some people who were “roaming around him”, adding that the one well-wisher the former premier had was his sister Aleema Khan. However, he regretted that the PTI chief never listened to her.

He added that Mr Khan was wrongly convicted in the Toshakhana refere­nce and asserted that Gen Naseer had nothing to do with the custodial torture of Shahbaz Gill.

Published in Dawn, November 11th, 2022

Opinion

Four hundred seats?

Four hundred seats?

The mix of divisive cultural politics and grow­th-oriented economics that feeds Hindu middle-class ambition and provides targeted welfare are key ingredients in the BJP’s political trajectory.

Editorial

Weathering the storm
Updated 29 Apr, 2024

Weathering the storm

Let 2024 be the year when we all proactively ensure that our communities are safeguarded and that the future is secure against the inevitable next storm.
Afghan repatriation
29 Apr, 2024

Afghan repatriation

COMPARED to the roughshod manner in which the caretaker set-up dealt with the issue, the elected government seems a...
Trying harder
29 Apr, 2024

Trying harder

IT is a relief that Pakistan managed to salvage some pride. Pakistan had taken the lead, then fell behind before...
Return to the helm
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Return to the helm

With Nawaz Sharif as PML-N president, will we see more grievances being aired?
Unvaxxed & vulnerable
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Unvaxxed & vulnerable

Even deadly mosquito-borne illnesses like dengue and malaria have vaccines, but they are virtually unheard of in Pakistan.
Gaza’s hell
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Gaza’s hell

Perhaps Western ‘statesmen’ may moderate their policies if a significant percentage of voters punish them at the ballot box.