Miranda Warning

Published September 23, 2022

BEATINGS, rape, sleep deprivation, electric shocks, even waterboarding — the Punjab Police is notorious for employing a gamut of torture tactics while ‘interrogating’ suspects. Individuals in custody — inevitably those without money or influence — are barely considered human beings, let alone citizens with constitutionally protected rights. As a result, many are left broken in body and spirit after being detained by law enforcement; some succumb to the brutality. In this sordid environment, where violation of the right to due process is routine, the police leadership has introduced a pilot project in Faisalabad district modelled after the ‘Miranda Warning’ as practised in the US since 1966. In that country, cops are bound to communicate the Miranda Warning/ Rights to individuals when taking them into custody. These inform the accused person that they have the right to remain silent and refuse to answer self-incriminating questions. The impetus behind adopting the procedure in Faisalabad, according to a senior police official quoted in this paper yesterday, is to address the practice of custodial torture and deaths.

Faisalabad is certainly an appropriate place to launch such a project. A study conducted by Yale University and the Justice Project Pakistan on 1,867 medico-legal certificates dated between 2006 and 2012 from the district, confirmed 1,424 allegations of police torture with physical evidence. Yet not a single case, by the time the findings were made public in 2015, had been investigated or the cops responsible prosecuted. This impunity indicates a sociocultural acceptance of torture as a legitimate means of investigating crime. While the move to introduce the practice of Miranda Warning/ Rights constitutes at least an acknowledgment of the rights of people in custody and is a shift in the correct direction, it will likely prove insufficient to tip the scales to any significant degree. Torture is endemic because it stems from a particular mindset shaped by an authoritarian subculture within law enforcement; also, the politics of policing are premised on the institutional weakness of law-enforcement agencies. Perhaps most crucially, torture is yet to be expressly criminalised in Pakistan. There is no mention of it in the PPC or the CrPC. While the Police Order 2002, under which the Punjab Police functions, does stipulate penalties against police officers who inflict “violence or torture” upon anyone in their custody, there is no definition of torture, which is a critical omission. Lawmakers must step up to make torture unacceptable, with severe repercussions for those who resort to it.

Published in Dawn, September 23rd, 2022

Opinion

The Dar story continues

The Dar story continues

One wonders what the rationale was for the foreign minister — a highly demanding, full-time job — being assigned various other political responsibilities.

Editorial

Wheat protests
Updated 01 May, 2024

Wheat protests

The government should withdraw from the wheat trade gradually, replacing the existing market support mechanism with an effective new one over the next several years.
Polio drive
01 May, 2024

Polio drive

THE year’s fourth polio drive has kicked off across Pakistan, with the aim to immunise more than 24m children ...
Workers’ struggle
01 May, 2024

Workers’ struggle

FACED with high inflation and bleak economic prospects nationally, the workers of Pakistan have little to celebrate...
All this talk
Updated 30 Apr, 2024

All this talk

The other parties are equally legitimate stakeholders in the country’s political future, and it must give them due consideration.
Monetary policy
30 Apr, 2024

Monetary policy

ALIGNING its decision with the trend in developed economies, the State Bank has acted wisely by holding its key...
Meaningless appointment
30 Apr, 2024

Meaningless appointment

THE PML-N’s policy of ‘family first’ has once again triggered criticism. The party’s latest move in this...