ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Friday rejected a request seeking transfer of the appeal against conviction of Usman Mirza and his accomplices in the couple harassment case.

The trial court on March 24 sentenced Mirza and his four accomplices to life imprisonment.

The sexual harassment case had surfaced in July 2021 after a video went viral showing the convicts maltreating a couple.

Initially, a first information report (FIR) was registered under section 341 (punishment for wrongful restraint), 354A (assault or use of criminal force against woman and stripping her of her clothes), 506 (ii) (punishment for criminal intimidation) and 509 (word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman) of Pakistan Penal Code (PPC).

Later, sections pertaining to rape, sexual abuse, extortion and wrongful confinement were also added to the FIR.

Mothers of Mirza and some other convicts on Friday approached the rostrum and requested IHC Justice Mohsin Akhter Kayani for the transfer of the case, saying earlier the bench had passed an adverse order against the convicts.

Justice Kayani, however, rejected the request and asked the counsel to advance their arguments against the conviction.

In September last year, Additional District and Sessions Judge Ata Rabbani convicted Usman, Shaheen, Attaur Rehman, Adaras Qayyum Butt and Mohib Khan and sentenced them to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs200,000 each.

The victim couple during the cross-examination in January this year retracted from their statement recorded before the magistrate under section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) in which they had accused Usman and his accomplices of sexually abusing, filming and extorting money from them.

As per the 44-page verdict of the trial court, the police, who were the complainant in the case, took the suspects into custody and after registration of the FIR the victims identified them and recorded their statements before the magistrate against them.

Condoning the delay in registration of the FIR, the court stated that this was due to fear and stress and “this reason logically appeals to the common prudence because normally people do hesitate to provide the information promptly to police in such cases where honour and prestige is involved.”

Published in Dawn, July 2nd, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Unsustainable growth
Updated 23 Jun, 2026

Unsustainable growth

CLICHÉS are an essential part of political rhetoric. But when repeated often, they lose their impact. So when...
Banned speeches
23 Jun, 2026

Banned speeches

NATIONAL Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq on Sunday formally lifted long-standing restrictions on the airing of ...
New GB government
23 Jun, 2026

New GB government

WITH the newly elected lawmakers of the Gilgit-Baltistan Assembly taking oath on Monday, the PPP looks set to head...
A costly cut
Updated 22 Jun, 2026

A costly cut

Climate risks are increasing and public investment should reflect that reality.
Guarded access
22 Jun, 2026

Guarded access

ONE of the government’s ‘novel’ proposals to snag tax evaders has collided with some harsh realities. On...
Lyari’s passion
22 Jun, 2026

Lyari’s passion

THE love for football in Lyari knows no bounds. The World Cup might be underway thousands of miles away in North...