Senators spar over first Black woman nominee for US Supreme Court

Published March 22, 2022
Ketanji Brown Jackson testifying during a hearing of the US Senate’s judiciary committee on April 28 last year.—AFP
Ketanji Brown Jackson testifying during a hearing of the US Senate’s judiciary committee on April 28 last year.—AFP

WASHINGTON: Sena­tors launched marathon hearings on Monday on Ketanji Brown Jackson’s bid to be the first Black woman on America’s Supreme Court, with opposing sides sparring on her sentencing record as Republicans sought to frame her as soft on crime.

President Joe Biden’s pick to join the nation’s highest court was formally introduced at the start of televised hearings that will go on to include two days of questioning and a final day of testimony from outside witnesses.

Biden released a statement on social media just before Jackson’s arrival at the US Capitol complex, describing her as “a brilliant legal mind with the utmost character and integrity.”

A 51-year-old former federal public defender with almost a decade of experience as a judge on lower courts, Jackson previously served as a law clerk to Stephen Breyer, the retiring liberal justice she is being nominated to replace.

She is the first Black woman tapped for a seat on the court and would also be the only nominee of a Democratic president to be confirmed since Elena Kagan in 2010.

But while the historic significance is enormous, the prospects for major drama are low, with a green light from the Senate all but assured and the 6-3 conservative balance of the court not in play.

As the final word on all civil and criminal legal disputes, as well as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution, the Supreme Court seeks to ensure the American people equal justice under the law.

It is a check on the power wielded by the other branches of government and the arbiter of disputes covering all aspects of American life, from religious liberty and voting rights to gun ownership, abortion access and gay marriage.

Democratic Senator Amy Klobuchar said in her address supporting the nomination that the court “decides cases with life-changing consequences.” The Senate Judiciary Committee is meeting on Monday through Thursday to consider Jackson’s nomination, which is being conducted by a 50-50 chamber controlled by Democrats, meaning there is no room for missteps.

No red flags have been raised about Jackson’s record that would imperil her prospects, and Republicans have pledged to avoid the kind of “character assassination” they argue Democrats staged before the confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh in 2018.

But conservatives have been signaling that they intend to go after her record as a public defender and raise rulings they say were too lenient in a bid to frame Biden — via his nominee — as soft on crime ahead of November’s midterm elections.

Staunch right-winger Josh Hawley has already suggested that Jackson has a pattern of “letting child porn offenders off the hook” and added Monday that he intended to have a “very candid” conversation with her about her sentencing history.

Published in Dawn, March 22nd, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Weathering the storm
Updated 29 Apr, 2024

Weathering the storm

Let 2024 be the year when we all proactively ensure that our communities are safeguarded and that the future is secure against the inevitable next storm.
Afghan repatriation
29 Apr, 2024

Afghan repatriation

COMPARED to the roughshod manner in which the caretaker set-up dealt with the issue, the elected government seems a...
Trying harder
29 Apr, 2024

Trying harder

IT is a relief that Pakistan managed to salvage some pride. Pakistan had taken the lead, then fell behind before...
Return to the helm
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Return to the helm

With Nawaz Sharif as PML-N president, will we see more grievances being aired?
Unvaxxed & vulnerable
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Unvaxxed & vulnerable

Even deadly mosquito-borne illnesses like dengue and malaria have vaccines, but they are virtually unheard of in Pakistan.
Gaza’s hell
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Gaza’s hell

Perhaps Western ‘statesmen’ may moderate their policies if a significant percentage of voters punish them at the ballot box.