THE HAGUE: Lawyers for Myanmar’s military rulers on Monday sought to have a case at the United Nations’ top court that accuses the Southeast Asian nation of genocide against the Rohingya ethnic minority dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Public hearings at the International Court of Justice went ahead amid questions about who should represent Myanmar in the aftermath of the military take-over of the country last year.

A shadow administration known as the National Unity Government made up of representatives including elected lawmakers who were prevented from taking their seats by the military takeover had argued that it should be representing Myanmar in court.

But, instead, it was the administration installed by the military. The legal team was led by Ko Ko Hlaing, the minister for international cooperation.

He replaced pro-democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi, who led the country’s legal team at earlier hearings in the case in 2019. She now is in prison after being convicted on what her supporters call trumped-up charges.

As the hearing started, the court’s president, US Judge Joan Donoghue, noted that the parties to a contentious case before the court are states, not particular governments.

A Myanmar rights group questioned the court’s decision to allow the military regime to represent Myanmar, which was formerly known as Burma.

“We are glad the case is going forward but find it deeply troubling that the military is allowed to appear before the court as representatives of Burma,” Burma Human Rights Network’s Executive Director Kyaw Win said in a statement.

The coup regime is in the middle of a horrific campaign of violence against civilians, and the last thing they should be given is any legitimacy in a UN body.

Hlaing told the court Myanmar had legal challenges to the court’s jurisdiction and the case’s admissibility, including that it should not go ahead because the case was brought by Gambia on behalf of the Organization of Islamic States.

Lawyer Christopher Staker argued that the court can only hear cases between states and that Gambia was acting as a proxy for the Muslim organization.

Another lawyer, Stefan Talmon, said that Gambia could not bring the case to court as it was not directly linked to the events in Myanmar.

Myanmar submits that the Gambia lacks standing in the present case and that, accordingly, its application should be dismissed as inadmissible, Talmon told judges.

Lawyers for Gambia are scheduled to respond on Wednesday.

Ahead of Monday’s hearing, members of Myanmar’s National Unity Government, urged the court not to accept representatives of the military rulers.

“It would be a most profound injustice to the Rohingya if the military were to be both their abusers and have any voice in the court, said the unity governments foreign minister, Zin Mar Aung.

The organization said it has contacted the court seeking to withdraw Myanmar’s preliminary objections to the case. The national unity government says it is the country’s only legitimate government but no foreign government has recognized it.

The dispute at the world court in The Hague reflects a broader struggle in the international community over whom to accept as Myanmar’s legitimate rulers in the aftermath of the coup.

Published in Dawn, February 22nd, 2022