Islamabad couple harassment case: Victim retracts statement, says does not want to pursue case

Published January 11, 2022
This photo shows Usman Mirza, the primary accused in the case. — Photo provided by Shakeel Qarar/File
This photo shows Usman Mirza, the primary accused in the case. — Photo provided by Shakeel Qarar/File

In a surprise turn of events, the female victim in the Islamabad couple harassment case on Tuesday retracted her statement against the accused and informed the trial court that she did not wish to pursue the case.

The case had surfaced when a video of four persons holding a couple at gunpoint, forcing them to strip and then beating them up had gone viral on social media last year in July.

Initially, an FIR was registered under section 341 (punishment for wrongful restraint), 354A (assault or use of criminal force against woman and stripping her of her clothes), 506 (ii) (punishment for criminal intimidation) and 509 (word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman) of Pakistan Penal Code.

Later, sections pertaining to rape, sexual abuse, extortion, and wrongful confinement were also included in the FIR.

In September, charges were framed against the primary accused, Usman Mirza, and co-accused Hafiz Ataur Rehman, Adaras Qayyum Butt, Rehan, Umar Bilal Marwat, Mohib Bangash and Farhan Shaheen.

Additional District and Sessions Judge Atta Rabbani presided over today's hearing where Mirza and the others were also produced before the court.

The judge directed officials to transfer the accused to the bakshi khana, a temporary lockup situated in the district courts, after marking their attendance.

The complainant couple were initially not present for the hearing but appeared later alongside their lawyer Hassan Javed Shorash.

In July, the victims had identified three of the suspects in an identification parade held at Adiala Jail

However, during the hearing today, the accused's lawyers cross-examined the girl, who told the judge that she did not go to Adiala Jail and had not taken part in the identification parade.

She said that police officials had visited her multiple times and asked for her signature and thumbprint on blank pieces of paper. "I do not know any of the accused and do not want to pursue the case," she said.

She also told the court that she did not pay ransom to anyone. She said that none of the accused had tried to sexually assault her.

She also singled out one of the accused, Rehan, and said that she did not know him and he did not make the video. She said that the police had "made up" the whole thing.

She also submitted a stamp paper in court and said that she had not submitted the same under any "pressure". "I did not identify any of the accused and did not sign any papers," she said.

In the affidavit, a copy of which is available with Dawn.com, the girl said that the accused arrested in the case were not those who were recorded in the video of the incident.

She said that none of the accused arrested in the case forced themselves upon her, make any videos or forcibly strip the couple.

She also said that she had not identified any of the arrested suspects in front of the police or a judicial magistrate, adding that she did not want to take any sort of action against any of those arrested or nominated in the case.

She stated that she was submitting this affidavit of her own free will and free of any pressure.

She also told the court that she did not want to appear for subsequent hearings in the case. However, the judge told her that she would have to appear and adjourned the hearing for January 18.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.