JCP meets today to discuss elevation of two lawyers as IHC judges

Published December 3, 2020
Picked by IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah for the coveted posts, the nominees are Babar Sattar and Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri. — IHC website/File
Picked by IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah for the coveted posts, the nominees are Babar Sattar and Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri. — IHC website/File

ISLAMABAD: The Judi­cial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) is expected to deliberate on Thursday over the elevation of two prominent lawyers to the position of judge of the Islamabad High Court (IHC).

Picked by IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah for the coveted posts, the nominees are Babar Sattar and Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri.

The JCP is also expected to consider elevation to fill the office of the chief justice of the Peshawar High Court which fell vacant after the death of Justice Waqar Seth, who died of coronavirus on Nov 13.

As commanded by Article 175-A of the Constitution, the JCP meeting will be presided over by Chief Justice of Pakistan Gulzar Ahmed and attended by the IHC chief justice in addition to four senior most judges of the Supreme Court, namely Justice Mushir Alam, Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Qazi Faez Isa and Justice Maqbool Baqar.

Senior puisne judge of the IHC Justice Aamer Farooq will also attend the JCP meeting in addition to federal Law Minister Dr Farogh Naseem, Attorney General for Pakistan Khalid Jawed Khan, and Senior Advocate nominated by the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) Akhtar Hussain. Islamabad Bar Council’s Vice Chairman Qazi Rafiuddin Babar is also a member of the JCP.

Already the antecedents committee headed by Justice Umar Ata Bandial and the professional committee under Justice Mushir Alam had met to consider the nominations for the IHC.

Interestingly, when the JCP will consider the recommendations forwarded by the IHC CJ, Justice Qazi Faez Isa will also be sitting in the meeting who was recently represented by Babar Sattar before a ten-judge full court of the Supreme Court hearing his petition against the filing of the presidential reference which was quashed by the court. Before the Supreme Court, Babar Sattar had mainly focused his arguments around the Income Tax laws and the implication of Section 116 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.

Mr Sattar had tried to convince the apex court through his arguments that the tax liability was a matter between the citizen and the state and no tax demand could be generated against the citizen except by competent authority under the tax laws.

Published in Dawn, December 3rd, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...
Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...